the benefits of peer-led teaching in medical education
Clicks: 113
ID: 229728
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
105 views
20 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Silvia Allikmets,1 Jasper P Vink2 1King’s College London School of Medicine, 2Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK In their article, Fujiwara et al1 discussed the effect of peer-led training of basic life support in the education of medical students. As the training of medical students is a continuously dynamic and developing field, such statistically significant information is useful to consider when improving medical teaching programs. While we agree with the conclusions drawn by Fujiwara et al,1 we suggest that peer-led teaching is superior to conventional (eg, professor-led) learning methods in medical education, providing benefits for students, tutors, and their faculties. View original paper by Fujiwara and colleagues.
| Reference Key |
s2016advancesthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Allikmets S;Vink JP |
| Journal | current opinion in anaesthesiology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.