the benefits of peer-led teaching in medical education
Clicks: 121
ID: 229728
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
106 views
21 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Silvia Allikmets,1 Jasper P Vink2 1King’s College London School of Medicine, 2Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK In their article, Fujiwara et al1 discussed the effect of peer-led training of basic life support in the education of medical students. As the training of medical students is a continuously dynamic and developing field, such statistically significant information is useful to consider when improving medical teaching programs. While we agree with the conclusions drawn by Fujiwara et al,1 we suggest that peer-led teaching is superior to conventional (eg, professor-led) learning methods in medical education, providing benefits for students, tutors, and their faculties. View original paper by Fujiwara and colleagues.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (114 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
s2016advancesthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Allikmets S;Vink JP |
| Journal | current opinion in anaesthesiology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.