Indexed in Journament

journal of critical care

ISSN 1557-8615· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0/100
Journament Score
#6,394
Journament Rank
25
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j crit care
Abbreviated Name j crit care
ISSN 1557-8615
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-critical-care

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Comparison between logistic regression and machine learning algorithms on survival prediction of traumatic brain injuries.
Feng, Jin-Zhou;Wang, Yu;Peng, Jin;Sun, Ming-Wei;Zeng, Jun;Jiang, Hua;
Vol. 54 , pp. 110-116
406 views DOI Abstract
2009
de la violence à la subjectivité. // from violence to subjectivity.
;Lina María Vélez.
Vol. 6 , No. 10 , pp. -
399 views Abstract
2020
Clinical presentation and initial management critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Brescia, Italy.
Piva, Simone;Filippini, Matteo;Turla, Fabio;Cattaneo, Sergio;Margola, Alessio;De Fulviis, Silvia;Nardiello, Ida;Beretta, Alessandra;Ferrari, Laura;Trotta, Raffaella;Erbici, Gloria;Focà, Emanuele;Castelli, Francesco;Rasulo, Frank;Lanspa, Michael J;Latronico, Nicola;
Vol. 58 , pp. 29-33
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Incidence and mortality of healthcare-associated infections in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe burns.
Chen, Yin Yin;Chen, Ian Horng;Chen, Chii Shya;Sun, Shu Mei;
Vol. 54 , pp. 185-190
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring the nursing workload in intensive care with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS): A prospective study in 16 hospitals in Belgium
Bruyneel, A.
Vol. 54 , pp. 205-211
365 views DOI
2018
Secondary EMR data for quality improvement and research: A comparison of manual and electronic data collection from an integrated critical care electronic medical record system
Brundin-Mather, R.
Vol. 47 , pp. 295-301
357 views DOI
2020
A novel prediction equation of resting energy expenditure for Japanese septic patients.
Takemae, Akihito;Takazawa, Tomonori;Kamiyama, Jiro;Kanamoto, Masafumi;Tobe, Masaru;Hinohara, Hiroshi;Kunimoto, Fumio;Saito, Shigeru;
Vol. 56 , pp. 236-242
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychometric validation of the Chinese patient- and family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaires
Lai, V.
Vol. 54 , pp. 58-64
346 views DOI
2010
la comprensión clásica del suicidio. de Émile durkheim a nuestros días. // the classic understanding of suicide. from Émile durkheim to the present day.
;Andrés Felipe Palacio.
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. -
333 views Abstract
2019
Characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with severe hyperammonemia.
Jacoby, Katherine J;Singh, Parvati;Prekker, Matthew E;Leatherman, James W;
Vol. 56 , pp. 177-181
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
A national survey of critical care services in hospitals accredited for training in a lower-middle income country: Pakistan.
Hashmi, Madiha;Taqi, Arshad;Memon, Muhammad I;Ali, Syed Muneeb;Khaskheli, Saleh;Sheharyar, Muhammad;Hayat, Muhammad;Shiekh, Mohiuddin;Kodippily, Chamira;Gamage, Dilanthi;Dondorp, Arjen M;Haniffa, Rashan;Beane, Abi;
Vol. 60 , pp. 273-278
149 views DOI Abstract
2020
Safe bronchodilator treatment in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A single center experience
Miller, A.
Vol. 58 , pp. 56-57
103 views DOI
2020
Clinical presentation and initial management critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Brescia, Italy.
Piva, Simone;Filippini, Matteo;Turla, Fabio;Cattaneo, Sergio;Margola, Alessio;De Fulviis, Silvia;Nardiello, Ida;Beretta, Alessandra;Ferrari, Laura;Trotta, Raffaella;Erbici, Gloria;Focà, Emanuele;Castelli, Francesco;Rasulo, Frank;Lanspa, Michael J;Latronico, Nicola;
Vol. 58 , pp. 29-33
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Poor survival with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Pooled analysis of early reports
Henry, B.M.
Vol. 58 , pp. 27-28
275 views DOI
2020
A novel prediction equation of resting energy expenditure for Japanese septic patients.
Takemae, Akihito;Takazawa, Tomonori;Kamiyama, Jiro;Kanamoto, Masafumi;Tobe, Masaru;Hinohara, Hiroshi;Kunimoto, Fumio;Saito, Shigeru;
Vol. 56 , pp. 236-242
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increasing support by nasal high flow acutely modifies the ROX index in hypoxemic patients: A physiologic study
Mauri T;Carlesso E;Spinelli E;Turrini C;Corte FD;Russo R;Ricard JD;Pesenti A;Roca O;Grasselli G;;
Vol. 53 , pp. -
255 views Abstract
2019
Characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with severe hyperammonemia.
Jacoby, Katherine J;Singh, Parvati;Prekker, Matthew E;Leatherman, James W;
Vol. 56 , pp. 177-181
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring the nursing workload in intensive care with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS): A prospective study in 16 hospitals in Belgium
Bruyneel, A.
Vol. 54 , pp. 205-211
365 views DOI
2019
Incidence and mortality of healthcare-associated infections in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe burns.
Chen, Yin Yin;Chen, Ian Horng;Chen, Chii Shya;Sun, Shu Mei;
Vol. 54 , pp. 185-190
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychometric validation of the Chinese patient- and family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaires
Lai, V.
Vol. 54 , pp. 58-64
346 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.