Indexed in Journament

ophthalmology

ISSN 1549-4713· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0/100
Journament Score
#6,292
Journament Rank
32
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ophthalmology
Abbreviated Name ophthalmology
ISSN 1549-4713
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ophthalmology

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

1986
Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula
Vol. 93 , No. 5 , pp. -
538 views Abstract
1996
Characterization of epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography
Vol. 103 , No. 12 , pp. -
443 views Abstract
1985
Removal of epimacular membranes
Vol. 92 , No. 8 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2010
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery
Vol. 117 , No. 4 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
2018
Incidence and Outcomes of Repositioning Surgery to Correct Misalignment of Toric Intraocular Lenses
Vol. 125 , No. 1 , pp. -
398 views Abstract
2000
Effects of pterygium on corneal spherical power and astigmatism
Vol. 107 , No. 8 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2010
Application of visante optical coherence tomography tear meniscus height measurement in the diagnosis of dry eye disease
Vol. 117 , No. 10 , pp. -
385 views Abstract
1995
Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography
Vol. 102 , No. 2 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
2012
Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial.
Vol. 119 , No. 7 , pp. 1399-411
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blue-filter Fundus Photography for Detection of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in Myopic Eyes.
Vol. 126 , No. 8 , pp. 1118
357 views DOI
2019
Prescribing Patterns and Costs Associated with Postoperative Eye Drop Use in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Cataract Surgery.
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical Confusions in Ophthalmology: Description, Analysis, and Prevention of Errors from 2006 through 2017.
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation after Liposuction.
Vol. 126 , No. 9 , pp. 1287
205 views DOI
2019
Blue-filter Fundus Photography for Detection of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in Myopic Eyes.
Vol. 126 , No. 8 , pp. 1118
357 views DOI
2019
Associations with Corneal Hysteresis in a Population Cohort: Results from 96 010 UK Biobank Participants.
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
Real-World Assessment of Vitreous Structure and Visual Function after Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Vitreolysis.
243 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reply.
Vol. 126 , No. 9 , pp. e70-e71
51 views DOI
2018
Incidence and Outcomes of Repositioning Surgery to Correct Misalignment of Toric Intraocular Lenses
Vol. 125 , No. 1 , pp. -
398 views Abstract
2017
education, poverty and the trap of poor countries in the face of development
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 101-108
214 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.