The New England journal of medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#906 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

The New England journal of medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name N Engl J Med
Abbreviated Name n engl j med
ISSN 1533-4406
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.nejm.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (183 total)

1986
A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia
Vol. 315 , No. 9 , pp. -
590 views Abstract
2011
Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection
Vol. 364 , No. 25 , pp. -
567 views Abstract
2005
Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles
Vol. 352 , No. 14 , pp. -
540 views Abstract
1985
Response to measles vaccine in Haitian infants 6 to 12 months old. Influence of maternal antibodies, malnutrition, and concurrent illnesses
Vol. 313 , No. 9 , pp. -
534 views Abstract
2004
Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes
Vol. 350 , No. 1 , pp. -
511 views Abstract
2000
The risk of the hemolytic-uremic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections
Vol. 342 , No. 26 , pp. -
510 views Abstract
1991
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I
Vol. 324 , No. 6 , pp. -
504 views Abstract
1999
Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infections in Minnesota, 1992-1998. Investigation Team
Vol. 340 , No. 20 , pp. -
502 views Abstract
1992
Identification of women at unsuspected risk of primary infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 during pregnancy
Vol. 326 , No. 14 , pp. -
498 views Abstract
2006
Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults
Vol. 354 , No. 1 , pp. -
497 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.