journal de mycologie medicale | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4845 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal de mycologie medicale

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name journal de mycologie medicale
Abbreviated Name journal de mycologie medicale
ISSN 1156-5233
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-medical-mycology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2018
Onychomycosis: Which fungal species are involved? Experience of the Laboratory of Parasitology-Mycology of the Rabta Hospital of Tunis
Youssef, A.
Vol. 28 , pp. 651-654
323 views DOI
2010
on morphosyntactic and semantic conditions of conjuction syntactic transformations - gde, kako, da
;Stanojčić Živojin
Vol. 2010 , No. 66 , pp. 435-442
279 views DOI Abstract
2005
the word-family of s.-cr. batati, botati, butati "to hit, beat, push, etc.": derivation, semantics, etymology
;Vlajić-Popović Jasna
Vol. 2005 , No. 61 , pp. 57-93
256 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erratum to “The little story of the Journal de Mycologie Médicale/Journal of Medical Mycology” [J. Mycol. Med. 28 (2018) 587–589] (Journal de Mycologie Médicale (2018) 28(4) (587–589), (S1156523318301719), (10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.09.001))
Bastide, J.
Vol. 29 , pp. 99
248 views DOI
2015
causal-implicative relationships in the serbian hypotaxis (complex of generative complex sentences)
;Vojvodić Dojčil P.
Vol. 71 , No. 3-4 , pp. 121-186
244 views DOI Abstract
2018
The little story of the Journal de Mycologie Médicale/Journal of Medical Mycology
Bastide, J.
Vol. 28 , pp. 587-589
242 views DOI
2013
certain microsyntactic constructions in russian which include the word čto as a constituent element
;Iomdin L.L.
Vol. 2013 , No. 69 , pp. 137-147
213 views DOI Abstract
2013
once more on the verbal aspect and linguistic politeness in the slavonic imperative: a parallel with greek
;Benacchio Rosanna
Vol. 2013 , No. 69 , pp. 169-183
186 views DOI Abstract
2008
idioms containing the lexeme obraz
;Šipka Milan
Vol. 2008 , No. 64 , pp. 561-569
137 views DOI Abstract
2017
serbian language in the light of contrastive-typological researches
;Alanović Milivoj B.
Vol. 73 , No. 3-4 , pp. 355-388
108 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.