ACS chemical biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6109 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 minutes ago

ACS chemical biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ACS Chem Biol
Abbreviated Name acs chem biol
ISSN 1554-8937
Aim and Scope
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acbcct
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 04, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (265 total)

2014
Erratum: Recent mechanistic insights on glycoconjugate vaccines and future perspectives (ACS Chemical Biology (2013) 8 (1653-1663) DOI: 10.1021/cb400423g)
Berti, F.
Vol. 9 , pp. 2695
408 views DOI
2018
Hybrid Transcription Factor Engineering Activates the Silent Secondary Metabolite Gene Cluster for (+)-Asperlin in Aspergillus nidulans
Grau, M.
Vol. 13 , pp. 3193-3205
398 views DOI
2019
Overexpression of an LaeA-like Methyltransferase Upregulates Secondary Metabolite Production in .
Grau, Michelle F;Entwistle, Ruth;Oakley, C Elizabeth;Wang, Clay C C;Oakley, Berl R;
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. 1643-1651
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
Discovery of the Tyrobetaine Natural Products and Their Biosynthetic Gene Cluster via Metabologenomics.
Parkinson, Elizabeth I;Tryon, James H;Goering, Anthony W;Ju, Kou-San;McClure, Ryan A;Kemball, Jeremy D;Zhukovsky, Sara;Labeda, David P;Thomson, Regan J;Kelleher, Neil L;Metcalf, William W;
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 1029-1037
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
Erratum: Rutaecarpine analogues reduce lipid accumulation in adipocytes via inhibiting adipogenesis/lipogenesis with AMPK activation and UPR suppression (ACS Chemical Biology (2013) 8 (2301-2311))
Chen, Y.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1570-1571
359 views DOI
2019
F Paramagnetic Relaxation-Based NMR for Quaternary Structural Restraints of Ion Channels.
Bondarenko, Vasyl;Wells, Marta M;Chen, Qiang;Singewald, Kevin C;Saxena, Sunil;Xu, Yan;Tang, Pei;
352 views DOI Abstract
2013
Development of a highly visual, simple, and rapid test for the discovery of novel insulin mimetics in living vertebrates.
Lee, Jinho;Jung, Da-Woon;Kim, Woong-Hee;Um, Jung-In;Yim, Soon-Ho;Oh, Won Keun;Williams, Darren R;
Vol. 8 , No. 8 , pp. 1803-14
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Soluble Antigen Arrays Displaying Mimotopes Direct the Response of Diabetogenic T Cells.
Leon, Martin A;Firdessa-Fite, Rebuma;Ruffalo, Justin K;Pickens, Chad J;Sestak, Joshua O;Creusot, Remi J;Berkland, Cory;
331 views DOI Abstract
2015
Erratum: Role of SbmA in the uptake of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-peptide conjugates in E. coli (ACS Chemical Biology (2013) 8:2 (360-7) DOI: 10.1021/cb300434e)
Ghosal, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 631
319 views DOI
2018
Correction to: Rational Design of Novel Allosteric Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors Showing Antibacterial Effects on Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli Escape Variants (ACS Chemical Biology (2017) 12:7 (1848-1857) DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00175))
Srinivasan, B.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1407
318 views DOI
View All 265 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.