the nigerian postgraduate medical journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8287 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

the nigerian postgraduate medical journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name niger postgrad med j
Abbreviated Name the nigerian postgraduate medical journal
ISSN 1117-1936
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.npmj.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (58 total)

2014
price and income elasticity of australian retail finance: an autoregressive distributed lag (ardl) approach
;Helen Higgs;Andrew C. Worthington
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 114-126
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mycology-related dissertations from the faculty of pathology, national postgraduate medical college of Nigeria (1980-2017): output and scientific communication
Osaigbovo, I.
Vol. 26 , pp. 94-99
391 views DOI
Managing the sequelae of urology medical tourism: A single center experience.
Ahmed, Muhammed;Sudi, Abdullahi;Bello, Ahmad;Lawal, Ahmad Tijjani;Awaisu, Mudi;Maitama, Hussaini Yusuf;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 117-120
356 views DOI Abstract
Hearing threshold of deaf pupils in Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna, Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey.
Kirfi, Abdullahi Musa;Samdi, Musa Thomas;Salisu, Abubakar Danjuma;Fufore, Mohammed Bello;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 164-168
345 views DOI Abstract
2018
pancasila paradigm: methodology of wawasan nusantara for accounting of pancasila
;Iwan Triyuwono;Gugus Irianto;Bambang Hariadi
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 102-115
314 views DOI Abstract
Cohort event monitoring of patients treated for uncomplicated malaria with artemisinin-based combination therapies in selected hospitals and community pharmacies in Nigeria.
Bassi, P U;Osakwe, A I;Suku, C;Kalat, M;Elagbaje, C;Isah, A;Ayinbuomwan, S;Wammanda, R D;Bob-Okon, I I;Ambe, J;Mava, Y;Adesina, A O;Ugochukwu, C G;Nyong, E E;Ogunleye, O O;Onuoha, F;Jalo, I;Adegoke, V O;Balogun, S T;Ntadom, G;Ejiekpe, F N;Tahir, R;Dabit, K;Amodu, A A;Nwaosu, S;Habib, A T;
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 172-181
306 views DOI Abstract
2016
accounting for trust: a conceptual model for the determinants of trust in the australian public accountant – sme client relationship
;Michael Cherry
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 3-17
285 views DOI Abstract
2007
analysis of the tick size and the impact of varying dollar ticks on market quality – evidence from the sydney futures exchange
;Andrew Tan;Alex Frino;Elvis Jarnecic
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 16-39
280 views Abstract
2010
repairing organisational legitimacy : the case of the new zealand police
;Grant Samkin;Cliff Allen;Kristin Wallace
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 23-45
279 views Abstract
2017
consumer ethical decision making: intensity, self-consciousness and neutralization techniques
;Syed Afzal Moshadi Shah;Shehla Amjad
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 99-130
252 views DOI Abstract
View All 58 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.