Indexed in Journament

the nigerian postgraduate medical journal

ISSN 1117-1936· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,234 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
61 Articles
Scores higher than 54.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name niger postgrad med j
Abbreviated Name the nigerian postgraduate medical journal
ISSN 1117-1936
URL https://www.npmj.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 80.0 19.2
Diversity 33.3 28.8
Innovation 52.5 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 23.6 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (61)

2014
price and income elasticity of australian retail finance: an autoregressive distributed lag (ardl) approach
;Helen Higgs;Andrew C. Worthington
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 114-126
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mycology-related dissertations from the faculty of pathology, national postgraduate medical college of Nigeria (1980-2017): output and scientific communication
Osaigbovo, I.
Vol. 26 , pp. 94-99
407 views DOI
Managing the sequelae of urology medical tourism: A single center experience.
Ahmed, Muhammed;Sudi, Abdullahi;Bello, Ahmad;Lawal, Ahmad Tijjani;Awaisu, Mudi;Maitama, Hussaini Yusuf;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 117-120
400 views DOI Abstract
Hearing threshold of deaf pupils in Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna, Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey.
Kirfi, Abdullahi Musa;Samdi, Musa Thomas;Salisu, Abubakar Danjuma;Fufore, Mohammed Bello;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 164-168
392 views DOI Abstract
2018
pancasila paradigm: methodology of wawasan nusantara for accounting of pancasila
;Iwan Triyuwono;Gugus Irianto;Bambang Hariadi
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 102-115
340 views DOI Abstract
Cohort event monitoring of patients treated for uncomplicated malaria with artemisinin-based combination therapies in selected hospitals and community pharmacies in Nigeria.
Bassi, P U;Osakwe, A I;Suku, C;Kalat, M;Elagbaje, C;Isah, A;Ayinbuomwan, S;Wammanda, R D;Bob-Okon, I I;Ambe, J;Mava, Y;Adesina, A O;Ugochukwu, C G;Nyong, E E;Ogunleye, O O;Onuoha, F;Jalo, I;Adegoke, V O;Balogun, S T;Ntadom, G;Ejiekpe, F N;Tahir, R;Dabit, K;Amodu, A A;Nwaosu, S;Habib, A T;
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 172-181
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
accounting for trust: a conceptual model for the determinants of trust in the australian public accountant – sme client relationship
;Michael Cherry
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 3-17
331 views DOI Abstract
2010
repairing organisational legitimacy : the case of the new zealand police
;Grant Samkin;Cliff Allen;Kristin Wallace
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 23-45
320 views Abstract
2007
analysis of the tick size and the impact of varying dollar ticks on market quality – evidence from the sydney futures exchange
;Andrew Tan;Alex Frino;Elvis Jarnecic
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 16-39
303 views Abstract
2017
consumer ethical decision making: intensity, self-consciousness and neutralization techniques
;Syed Afzal Moshadi Shah;Shehla Amjad
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 99-130
284 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Yin and Yang of medical education
6 views DOI
2026
Retraction of: Impact of early biliary complications in liver transplantation in the presence or absence of a T-tube: a Chinese transplant centre experience
9 views DOI
2026
Verbal response and command following in acute bedside assessment
Jingquan Sun, Tao Yu
35 views DOI Abstract
2026
The silent epidemic in sacred lands: knee osteoarthritis burden from high-frequency ritual kneeling, 1990–2021
Peiyuan Tang, Meihui Huang, Ting Wen, Yusheng Li, Wenfeng Xiao, Bangbao Lu, Haitao Long, Xucheng Yang
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Productive struggle in medical education: what, why, and how?
Jessele S Y Lai, D H Choo, Rachelle S R Lai, Joel Lim, Desmond B. Teo, Li Feng Tan, Norshima Nashi, Isaac K S Ng
38 views DOI Abstract
2026
Structured clinical reflection in acute toxicology: bridging guidelines and bedside decision-making
Nusret Uysal, Aravindan Veiraiah, Berna Terzi̇oğlu Bebi̇toğlu, James Dear
39 views DOI Abstract
2026
Already a specialist, still a trainee: recognizing dual professional identity in subspecialty fellowship
Ömer Denizhan Tatar
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Response to “Self-discharge: intervention needed now?”: discharge documentation as a harm-reduction strategy
Jas Tin Lim
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
Renal replacement therapy: current modalities, indications, and clinical considerations
Laurena Dongmo Fotsing, Jay H Shubrook
34 views DOI Abstract
2026
Minimal haemodilution after rapid high-volume crystalloid infusion in healthy volunteers
Louise Thornfeldt Fisker Laugesen, Mikkel Brabrand, Peter Biesenbach
47 views DOI
Journament Score
35.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,234 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

23.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.