Indexed in Journament

physical review d

ISSN 2470-0010· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,280 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
151 Articles
Scores higher than 78.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé physical review d
Nom Abrégé physical review d
ISSN 2470-0010

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 70.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for physical review d
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.2
Accessibility 17.8
Timeliness 20.0 15.9
Diversity 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 5.0 11.5
Content Distribution 70.2 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (151)

2006
Muon-induced background study for underground laboratories
Vol. 73 , No. 5 , pp. 053004-
426 views DOI Abstract
2010
Observational constraints on the ultrahigh energy cosmic neutrino flux from the second flight of the ANITA experiment
Vol. 82 , No. 2 , pp. 022004-
390 views DOI Abstract
2018
Tests of Lorentz invariance at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Vol. 98 , No. 11 , pp. 112013-
369 views DOI Abstract
2012
Sterile neutrinos, coherent scattering, and oscillometry measurements with low-temperature bolometers
Vol. 85 , No. 1 , pp. 013009-
362 views DOI
2000
Bose-Einstein correlations in a space-time approach toe+e−annihilation into hadrons
Vol. 61 , No. 5 , pp. 054002-
345 views DOI
2006
Search for theΘ+pentaquark in the reactionsγp→K¯0K+nandγp→K¯0K0p
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 032001-
338 views DOI Abstract
1976
Neutrino-proton interactions at Fermilab energies: Experimental arrangement, analysis procedures, and qualitative features of the data
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 5-12
331 views DOI Abstract
1987
Study ofη’formation in photon-photon collisions
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 2650-2654
327 views DOI Abstract
2006
Muon-induced background study for underground laboratories
Vol. 73 , No. 5 , pp. 1-
322 views DOI
1996
Erratum: Order- α radiative corrections for semileptonic decays of unpolarized baryons
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 1241-
314 views DOI
2020
Improved measurement of B8 solar neutrinos with 1.5 kt·y of Borexino exposure
Vol. 101 , No. 6 , pp. 062001-
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comprehensive geoneutrino analysis with Borexino
Vol. 101 , No. 1 , pp. 012009-
302 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Search for a doubly charged DDK bound state in ϒ(1S, 2S) inclusive decays and via direct production in e+e− collisions at s=10.520 , 10.580, and 10.867 GeV
Vol. 102 , No. 11 , pp. 112001-
214 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comprehensive geoneutrino analysis with Borexino
Vol. 101 , No. 1 , pp. 012009-
231 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,280 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.