Observational constraints on the ultrahigh energy cosmic neutrino flux from the second flight of the ANITA experiment
Clicks: 392
ID: 271850
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
69.6
/100
392 views
270 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 151 articles by views in physical review d
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 151 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) completed its second Long Duration Balloon flight in January 2009, with 31 days aloft (28.5 live days) over Antarctica. ANITA searches for impulsive coherent radio Cherenkov emission from 200 to 1200 MHz, arising from the Askaryan charge excess in ultrahigh energy neutrino-induced cascades within Antarctic ice. This flight included significant improvements over the first flight in payload sensitivity, efficiency, and flight trajectory. Analysis of in-flight calibration pulses from surface and subsurface locations verifies the expected sensitivity. In a blind analysis, we find 2 surviving events on a background, mostly anthropogenic, of 0.97±0.42 events. We set the strongest limit to date for 1018–1021 eV cosmic neutrinos, excluding several current cosmogenic neutrino models.
| Reference Key |
wang2010physicalobservational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | P. W. Gorham,P. Allison,B. M. Baughman,James Beatty,Konstantin Belov,D. Z. Besson,S. Bevan,W. R. Binns,C. Chen,Pisin Chen,J. M. Clem,A. Connolly,M. Detrixhe,D. De Marco,P. F. Dowkontt,M. DuVernois,E. W. Grashorn,B. Hill,S. Hoover,M. Huang,M. H. Israel,A. Javaid,K. M. Liewer,S. Matsuno,B. C. Mercurio,C. Miki,M. Mottram,J. Nam,Ryan Nichol,K. Palladino,A. Romero-Wolf,L. Ruckman,D. Saltzberg,D. Seckel,G. S. Varner,A. G. Vieregg,Y. Wang;P. W. Gorham;P. Allison;B. M. Baughman;James Beatty;Konstantin Belov;D. Z. Besson;S. Bevan;W. R. Binns;C. Chen;Pisin Chen;J. M. Clem;A. Connolly;M. Detrixhe;D. De Marco;P. F. Dowkontt;M. DuVernois;E. W. Grashorn;B. Hill;S. Hoover;M. Huang;M. H. Israel;A. Javaid;K. M. Liewer;S. Matsuno;B. C. Mercurio;C. Miki;M. Mottram;J. Nam;Ryan Nichol;K. Palladino;A. Romero-Wolf;L. Ruckman;D. Saltzberg;D. Seckel;G. S. Varner;A. G. Vieregg;Y. Wang; |
| Journal | physical review d |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1103/physrevd.82.022004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.