neuroradiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#217 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

neuroradiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name neuroradiology
Abbreviated Name neuroradiology
ISSN 1432-1920
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/234
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

1970
Positional MRI: a technique for confirming the site of leakage in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea
Vol. 39 , No. 11 , pp. 818-820
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Convolutional neural network-based segmentation can help in assessing the substantia nigra in neuromelanin MRI.
358 views DOI Abstract
2013
fatty acid and phospholipase a2 plasma levels in children with autism níveis plasmáticos de ácidos graxos e fosfolipase a2 em crianças com autismo
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 76-80
353 views Abstract
2011
violência contra a mulher entre residentes de áreas urbanas de feira de santana, bahia violence against women among urban area residents in feira de santana, bahia, brazil
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 164-168
310 views DOI Abstract
1997
Positional MRI: a technique for confirming the site of leakage in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea
Vol. 39 , No. 11 , pp. -
298 views Abstract
2013
association between childhood trauma and loss of functionality in adult women with fibromyalgia associação entre trauma na infância e perda de funcionalidade em mulheres adultas com fibromialgia
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 46-54
297 views Abstract
2015
cross-cultural adaptation to portuguese of a measure of satisfaction with participation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (promis(r))
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 94-99
284 views DOI Abstract
2012
application of the rasch model in measuring personality disorders aplicação do modelo de rasch na medida de transtornos da personalidade
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 101-109
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Collaterals are a major determinant of the core but not the penumbra volume in acute ischemic stroke.
Vol. 61 , No. 9 , pp. 971-978
264 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.