Convolutional neural network-based segmentation can help in assessing the substantia nigra in neuromelanin MRI.

Clicks: 319
ID: 4826
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic test performance of the U-net-based segmentation method in neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging (NM-MRI) compared to the established manual segmentation method for Parkinson's disease (PD) diagnosis.NM-MRI datasets from two different 3T-scanners were used: a "principal dataset" with 122 participants and an "external validation dataset" with 24 participants, including 62 and 12 PD patients, respectively. Two radiologists performed SNpc manual segmentation. Inter-reader precision was determined using Dice coefficients. The U-net was trained with manual segmentation as ground truth and Dice coefficients used to measure accuracy. Training and validation steps were performed on the principal dataset using a 4-fold cross-validation method. We tested the U-net on the external validation dataset. SNpc hyperintense areas were estimated from U-net and manual segmentation masks, replicating a previously validated thresholding method, and their diagnostic test performances for PD determined.For SNpc segmentation, U-net accuracy was comparable to inter-reader precision in the principal dataset (Dice coefficient: U-net, 0.83 ± 0.04; inter-reader, 0.83 ± 0.04), but lower in external validation dataset (Dice coefficient: U-net, 079 ± 0.04; inter-reader, 0.85 ± 0.03). Diagnostic test performances for PD were comparable between U-net and manual segmentation methods in both principal (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: U-net, 0.950; manual, 0.948) and external (U-net, 0.944; manual, 0.931) datasets.U-net segmentation provided relatively high accuracy in the evaluation of the SNpc in NM-MRI and yielded diagnostic performance comparable to that of the established manual method.
Reference Key
le-berre2019convolutionalneuroradiology Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Le Berre, Alice;Kamagata, Koji;Otsuka, Yujiro;Andica, Christina;Hatano, Taku;Saccenti, Laetitia;Ogawa, Takashi;Takeshige-Amano, Haruka;Wada, Akihiko;Suzuki, Michimasa;Hagiwara, Akifumi;Irie, Ryusuke;Hori, Masaaki;Oyama, Genko;Shimo, Yashushi;Umemura, Atsushi;Hattori, Nobutaka;Aoki, Shigeki;
Journal neuroradiology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1007/s00234-019-02279-w
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.