Nature communications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#24 / 33,622
⭐ Average
Overall Score
53.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Nature communications

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Nat Commun
Abbreviated Name nature communications
ISSN 2041-1723
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (485 total)

2017
Flexible interlocked porous frameworks allow quantitative photoisomerization in a crystalline solid.
Zheng, Yongtai;Sato, Hiroshi;Wu, Pengyan;Jeon, Hyung Joon;Matsuda, Ryotaro;Kitagawa, Susumu;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 100
561 views DOI Abstract
2020
De novo generation of hit-like molecules from gene expression signatures using artificial intelligence
Méndez-Lucio, O.
Vol. 11 , pp. 0-0
535 views DOI
2019
The hidden structure of human enamel.
Beniash, Elia;Stifler, Cayla A;Sun, Chang-Yu;Jung, Gang Seob;Qin, Zhao;Buehler, Markus J;Gilbert, Pupa U P A;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 4383
535 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sialyl Lewis-P-selectin cascade mediates tumor-mesothelial adhesion in ascitic fluid shear flow.
Li, Shan-Shan;Ip, Carman K M;Tang, Matthew Y H;Tang, Maggie K S;Tong, Yin;Zhang, Jiangwen;Hassan, Ayon Ahmed;Mak, Abby S C;Yung, Susan;Chan, Tak-Mao;Ip, Philip P;Lee, Cheuk Lun;Chiu, Philip C N;Lee, Leo Tsz On;Lai, Hung-Cheng;Zeng, Jin-Zhang;Shum, Ho Cheung;Wong, Alice S T;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 2406
532 views DOI Abstract
2018
Microbiome characterization by high-throughput transfer RNA sequencing and modification analysis.
Schwartz, Michael H;Wang, Haipeng;Pan, Jessica N;Clark, Wesley C;Cui, Steven;Eckwahl, Matthew J;Pan, David W;Parisien, Marc;Owens, Sarah M;Cheng, Brian L;Martinez, Kristina;Xu, Jinbo;Chang, Eugene B;Pan, Tao;Eren, A Murat;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 5353
532 views DOI Abstract
2018
High-throughput in vivo mapping of RNA accessible interfaces to identify functional sRNA binding sites.
Mihailovic, Mia K;Vazquez-Anderson, Jorge;Li, Yan;Fry, Victoria;Vimalathas, Praveen;Herrera, Daniel;Lease, Richard A;Powell, Warren B;Contreras, Lydia M;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 4084
532 views DOI Abstract
2020
Author Correction: Human activity recognition using magnetic induction-based motion signals and deep recurrent neural networks (Nature Communications, (2020), 11, 1, (1551), 10.1038/s41467-020-15086-2)
Golestani, N.
Vol. 11 , pp. 0-0
526 views DOI
2019
Task complexity interacts with state-space uncertainty in the arbitration between model-based and model-free learning.
Kim, Dongjae;Park, Geon Yeong;O Doherty, John P;Lee, Sang Wan;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 5738
510 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tissue-specific (ts)CRISPR as an efficient strategy for in vivo screening in Drosophila.
Meltzer, Hagar;Marom, Efrat;Alyagor, Idan;Mayseless, Oded;Berkun, Victoria;Segal-Gilboa, Netta;Unger, Tamar;Luginbuhl, David;Schuldiner, Oren;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 2113
502 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interface-mediated Kirkendall effect and nanoscale void migration in bimetallic nanoparticles during interdiffusion
Chee, S.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
489 views DOI
View All 485 Articles
54
Overall
Average
85
15
30
50
55
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

53.7/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

84.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.