Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3084 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Am Med Inform Assoc
Abbreviated Name j am med inform assoc
ISSN 1527-974X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.jamia.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (69 total)

2019
Cohort selection for clinical trials: n2c2 2018 shared task track 1.
Stubbs, Amber;Filannino, Michele;Soysal, Ergin;Henry, Samuel;Uzuner, Özlem;
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Leaf: an open-source, model-agnostic, data-driven web application for cohort discovery and translational biomedical research.
Dobbins, Nicholas J;Spital, Clifford H;Black, Robert A;Morrison, Jason M;de Veer, Bas;Zampino, Elizabeth;Harrington, Robert D;Britt, Bethene D;Stephens, Kari A;Wilcox, Adam B;Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter;Mooney, Sean D;
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning from electronic health records across multiple sites: A communication-efficient and privacy-preserving distributed algorithm.
Duan, Rui;Boland, Mary Regina;Liu, Zixuan;Liu, Yue;Chang, Howard H;Xu, Hua;Chu, Haitao;Schmid, Christopher H;Forrest, Christopher B;Holmes, John H;Schuemie, Martijn J;Berlin, Jesse A;Moore, Jason H;Chen, Yong;
416 views DOI Abstract
1970
Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety
Koppel R;Wetterneck T;Telles JL;Karsh BT;;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2019
Development and application of a high throughput natural language processing architecture to convert all clinical documents in a clinical data warehouse into standardized medical vocabularies.
Afshar, Majid;Dligach, Dmitriy;Sharma, Brihat;Cai, Xiaoyuan;Boyda, Jason;Birch, Steven;Valdez, Daniel;Zelisko, Suzan;Joyce, Cara;Modave, François;Price, Ron;
Vol. 26 , pp. 1364-1369
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detecting conversation topics in primary care office visits from transcripts of patient-provider interactions.
Park, Jihyun;Kotzias, Dimitrios;Kuo, Patty;Logan Iv, Robert L;Merced, Kritzia;Singh, Sameer;Tanana, Michael;Karra Taniskidou, Efi;Lafata, Jennifer Elston;Atkins, David C;Tai-Seale, Ming;Imel, Zac E;Smyth, Padhraic;
390 views DOI Abstract
2017
Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications.
Kuo, Tsung-Ting;Kim, Hyeon-Eui;Ohno-Machado, Lucila;
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 1211-1220
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
New approaches to cohort selection.
Stubbs, Amber;Uzuner, Özlem;
Vol. 26 , No. 11 , pp. 1161-1162
364 views DOI
2019
High-throughput multimodal automated phenotyping (MAP) with application to PheWAS.
Liao, Katherine P;Sun, Jiehuan;Cai, Tianrun A;Link, Nicholas;Hong, Chuan;Huang, Jie;Huffman, Jennifer E;Gronsbell, Jessica;Zhang, Yichi;Ho, Yuk-Lam;Castro, Victor;Gainer, Vivian;Murphy, Shawn N;O'Donnell, Christopher J;Gaziano, J Michael;Cho, Kelly;Szolovits, Peter;Kohane, Isaac S;Yu, Sheng;Cai, Tianxi;
Vol. 26 , No. 11 , pp. 1255-1262
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Challenges and opportunities using online portals to recruit diverse patients to behavioral trials.
Alishahi Tabriz, Amir;Fleming, Patrice Jordan;Shin, Yongyun;Resnicow, Ken;Jones, Resa M;Flocke, Susan A;Shires, Deirdre A;Hawley, Sarah T;Willens, David;Lafata, Jennifer Elston;
347 views DOI Abstract
View All 69 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.