A multi-guideline clinical agent for vascular surgery: architecture, implementation, and benchmark evaluation

Clicks: 2
ID: 338750
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #88 of 89 articles by views in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) published by the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) span approximately 1100 pages whose simultaneous cross-referencing is impractical at the point of care. Unguarded large language models (LLMs) carry hallucination risk, motivating a guideline-locked design. METHODS: We describe the architecture and development of a context-aware clinical agent encompassing the full ESVS corpus of 14 CPGs. The system extends a validated single-guideline GraphRAG prototype with an LLM-driven Guideline Router, an embedded Context Gate that withholds retrieval when decision-critical parameters are absent, dual-channel retrieval, and GPT-5 synthesis under a mandatory citation template. An automated benchmark assessed the final system on 55 vignettes, scored by 2 blinded LLM judges over 3 runs (330 judgments), with clinician adjudication of every flagged claim. RESULTS: The system stayed within its locked corpus, declined all out-of-scope queries, and achieved 98.4% guideline-routing recall. The Context Gate showed 91.9% specificity and 78.6% sensitivity for underspecified queries, and all 259 cited recommendations were verifiable within the locked corpus. Automated judges flagged an unsupported claim in 18.2% of items under a sensitive screening definition; on adjudication by 2 vascular surgeons, 7.3% of items contained a clinically consequential error, none graded capable of causing harm. Clinical acceptability of complete answers was not scored and is reserved for prospective expert evaluation. CONCLUSION: These results support the feasibility of a multi-guideline context-aware clinical agent for vascular surgery; citation traceability and locked-corpus provenance facilitate future auditability.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225237378 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jamia/ocag178
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.