journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5046 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name j clin biochem nutr
Abbreviated Name j clin biochem nutr
ISSN 0912-0009
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Formation of reactive oxygen species by irradiation of cold atmospheric pressure plasma jet to water depends on the irradiation distance.
Anzai, Kazunori;Aoki, Tamami;Koshimizu, Satoko;Takaya, Reina;Tsuchida, Kazunori;Takajo, Tokuko;
Vol. 64 , No. 3 , pp. 187-193
310 views DOI Abstract
2010
redes de inclusão e burocracias de exclusão: riscos e seguros de responsabilidade civil entre os mais pobres na África do sul inclusive networks and exclusive bureaucracies: risks and commercial insurance for the south african poor
;Erik Bähre
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 465-485
301 views Abstract
2014
No correlation is found for vegetables between antioxidant capacity and potential benefits in improving antioxidant function in aged rats
Ji, L.
Vol. 54 , pp. 198-203
292 views DOI
2006
binding labour and capital: moral obligation and forms of regulation in a regional economy ligando o trabalho e o capital: obrigação moral e formas de regulação numa economia regional
;Susana Narotzky
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 337-354
290 views Abstract
2006
dinâmicas e processos de transformação económica: do contrabando à industria de torrefacção de café em campo maior dynamics and processes of economic transformation: from contraband to the coffee industry in campo maior
;Luís Cunha
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 251-262
287 views Abstract
2012
o divino retorno: uma abordagem fenomenológica de fluxos identitários entre a religião e a cultura the holy return: a phenomenological approach of identity flows between religion and culture
;José Rogério Lopes
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 339-364
262 views Abstract
2009
alcoolismo: doença e significado em alcoólicos anônimos alcoholism: illness and meaning in alcoholics anonymous
;Edemilson Antunes de Campos
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 103-124
252 views Abstract
2020
Differences in efficacy and safety of lubiprostone used for idiopathic vs opioid-induced constipation: meta-analysis of East Asian and Western populations
Sugimoto M;Murata M;Mizuno H;;
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. -
250 views Abstract
2009
antropología de la crianza: la producción social de “un padre responsable” en barrios populares del gran buenos aires anthropology of upbringing: the social production of “a responsible parent” in poor neighborhoods in the suburbs of buenos aires
;Laura Santillán
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 265-289
239 views Abstract
2007
emoções e guerras: da micronésia às bases militares americanas
;Clara Saraiva;Cristiana Bastos
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 473-485
187 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.