european journal of nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2355 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

european journal of nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name eur j nutr
Abbreviated Name eur j nutr
ISSN 1436-6215
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/394
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2019
TMAO, creatine and 1-methylhistidine in serum and urine are potential biomarkers of cod and salmon intake: a randomised clinical trial in adults with overweight or obesity.
Hagen, Ingrid V;Helland, Anita;Bratlie, Marianne;Midttun, Øivind;McCann, Adrian;Sveier, Harald;Rosenlund, Grethe;Mellgren, Gunnar;Ueland, Per Magne;Gudbrandsen, Oddrun Anita;
481 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term Paleolithic diet is associated with lower resistant starch intake, different gut microbiota composition and increased serum TMAO concentrations.
Genoni, Angela;Christophersen, Claus T;Lo, Johnny;Coghlan, Megan;Boyce, Mary C;Bird, Anthony R;Lyons-Wall, Philippa;Devine, Amanda;
470 views DOI Abstract
2020
A theory-based randomized controlled trial in promoting fruit and vegetable intake among schoolchildren: PROFRUVE study.
Arrizabalaga-López, María;Rada-Fernández de Jáuregui, Diego;Portillo, María Del Puy;Mauleón, Jose Ramón;Martínez, Olaia;Etaio, Iñaki;Tormo-Santamaría, María;Bernabeu-Maestre, Josep;Rodríguez, Víctor Manuel;
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of food additives, artificial sweeteners and domestic hygiene products on the human gut microbiome and its fibre fermentation capacity.
Gerasimidis, Konstantinos;Bryden, Katie;Chen, Xiufen;Papachristou, Eleftheria;Verney, Anais;Roig, Marine;Hansen, Richard;Nichols, Ben;Papadopoulou, Rodanthi;Parrett, Alison;
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reply to the Letter: Increased bioavailability of plasma polyphenols via the intestinal fermentation of soybean fibers: a role for gut microbiome?
Trakooncharoenvit, Aphichat;Tanaka, Seiya;Mizuta, Erika;Hira, Tohru;Hara, Hiroshi;
Vol. 58 , No. 6 , pp. 2563
364 views DOI
2019
Increased bioavailability of plasma polyphenols via the intestinal fermentation of soybean fibers: a role for gut microbiome?
Chirumbolo, Salvatore;
Vol. 58 , No. 6 , pp. 2561-2562
350 views DOI
2019
Teff consumption and anemia in pregnant Ethiopian women: a case–control study
Mohammed, S.
Vol. 58 , pp. 2011-2018
342 views DOI
2019
Attenuation of the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and diabetes risk by adiposity adjustment: a secondary analysis of national health survey data.
Jing, Yi;Han, Thang S;Alkhalaf, Majid M;Lean, Michael E J;
Vol. 58 , No. 4 , pp. 1703-1710
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
Lifestyle and specific dietary habits in the Italian population: focus on sugar intake and association with anthropometric parameters-the LIZ (Liquidi e Zuccheri nella popolazione Italiana) study.
Marangoni, Franca;Brignoli, Ovidio;Cricelli, Claudio;Poli, Andrea;
Vol. 56 , No. 4 , pp. 1685-1691
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gluten-free-rendered products contribute to imbalanced diets in children and adolescents with celiac disease
Larretxi, I.
Vol. 58 , pp. 775-783
270 views DOI
View All 25 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.