Indexed in Journament

New England Journal of Medicine

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
21.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,706 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
78 Articles
Scores higher than 2.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name New England Journal of Medicine
Abbreviated Name new england journal of medicine

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 16.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for New England Journal of Medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 3.6 11.5
Content Distribution 16.7 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (78)

2020
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
15,528 views DOI
2020
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
10,740 views DOI
2009
cavernous nerve reconstitution with the use of bone marrow stem cells and erectile function evaluation: an experimental animal study
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 415-420
668 views Abstract
2008
psychosomatic or somatopsychotic? a critical analysis of psychosomatic medicine
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 134-141
650 views Abstract
2010
research knowledge in undergraduate school in brazil: a comparison between medical and law students
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 273-280
549 views Abstract
2009
high frequency oscillatory ventilation in meconium aspiration syndrome
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 201-205
504 views Abstract
2010
expression of p53, p16 and ki67 proteins in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and their relation with survival and cell differentiation
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 444-448
467 views Abstract
2008
orotracheal intubation and dysphagia: comparison of patients with and without brain damage
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 343-349
462 views Abstract
2007
ethical analysis of breast cancer diagnosis
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 220-224
449 views Abstract
2003
linear programming applied to healthcare problems
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 105-109
402 views Abstract
2021
Audio interview: The omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2
Vol. 385 , pp. 0-0
21 views DOI
2020
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
10,740 views DOI
2020
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
15,528 views DOI
2020
Effects of Diet versus Gastric Bypass on Metabolic Function in Diabetes
Vol. 383 , No. 8 , pp. 721-732
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Medical journals and the 2019-nCoV outbreak
Vol. 382 , pp. 866
160 views DOI
2019
Variant PADI3 in central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia
Vol. 380 , pp. 833-841
198 views DOI
2017
Accelerated approval and expensive drugs - A challenging combination
Vol. 376 , pp. 2001-2004
276 views DOI
2012
intermediate pilomyxoid astrocytoma and diencephalic syndrome: imaging findings
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 236-238
225 views Abstract
Journament Score
21.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,706 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

21.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

16.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.