Indexed in Journament

british journal of dermatology

ISSN 0007-0963· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,883 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
43 Articles
Scores higher than 66.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name british journal of dermatology
Abbreviated Name british journal of dermatology
ISSN 0007-0963
URL https://academic.oup.com/bjd

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for british journal of dermatology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 55.6 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 4.3 9.7
Content Distribution 60.6 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2001
monitoring of the harmful concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-d) in soils with and without organic matter
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 485-488
317 views Abstract
2017
Switching expensive drugs with frequently diminishing value
Vol. 177 , pp. 338-339
296 views DOI
2006
development of nanocapsule suspensions and nanocapsule spray-dried powders containing melatonin
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 562-569
285 views Abstract
2002
fuel cells: spectroscopic studies in the electrocatalysis of alcohol oxidation
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 401-409
271 views Abstract
2001
the stereochemistry of the addition of chlorotitanium enolates of n-acyl oxazolidin-2-ones to 5- and 6- membered n-acyliminium ions
Vol. 12 , No. 5 , pp. 634-651
269 views Abstract
2002
characterization of spin-coated polymer films
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 695-699
268 views Abstract
2002
oxidative addition reactions of i2 with [hir4(co)10-n(pph3 )n(m-pph2)] (n = 1 and 2) and crystal and molecular structure of [hir4(m-i)2(co)7 (pph3)(m-pph2)]
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 682-686
265 views Abstract
2017
Switching expensive drugs with frequently diminishing value
Vol. 177 , pp. 338-339
296 views DOI
2010
Encoding a superantigen by Staphylococcus aureus does not affect clinical characteristics of infected atopic dermatitis lesions
Vol. 163 , No. 6 , pp. 1308-1311
208 views DOI Abstract
2006
copper, lead and cadmium loads and behavior in urban stormwater runoff in curitiba, brazil
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 53-60
199 views Abstract
2006
development of nanocapsule suspensions and nanocapsule spray-dried powders containing melatonin
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 562-569
285 views Abstract
2006
incl3/naclo: a reagent for allylic chlorination of terminal olefins
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 321-327
197 views Abstract
2004
dipeptide metabolites from the marine derived bacterium streptomyces acrymicini
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 441-444
133 views Abstract
Journament Score
35.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,883 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.