Indexed in Journament

bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,622 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 36.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine
Abbreviated Name bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 54.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 67.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 54.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 67.6 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2008
perilaku wirausaha industri keramik berskala kecil untuk meningkatkan daya saing produk di malang
;Sri Hadiati
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 115-123
404 views Abstract
2018
Issues and difficulties of the management of expensive drugs not included in the list in addition for a hospital dealing with cancers
Blay, J.
Vol. 202 , pp. 1003-1012
303 views
2013
pengaruh budaya perusahaan terhadap prestasi kerja karyawan pt pembangkitan jawa-bali surabaya unit pelayanan pemeliharaan
;Riyan Sisiawan Putra
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 131-140
297 views Abstract
2008
pengaruh motivasi, persepsi dan sikap konsumen terhadap keputusan pembelian sepeda motor merek "honda" di kawasan surabaya barat
;Dewi Urip Wahyuni
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
254 views Abstract
2010
prinsip-prinsip manajemen bisnis keluarga (family business) dikaitkan dengan kedudukan mandiri perseroan terbatas (pt)
;Augustinus Simanjuntak
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 113-120
251 views Abstract
2014
performance evaluation of property and real estate companies listed on indonesia stock exchange using data envelopment analysis
;Tessa V. Soetanto;Liem Pei Fun
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 121-130
237 views Abstract
2015
memahami ekuitas merek perguruan tinggi: penelitian empiris pada stie surakarta, jawa tengah, indonesia
;Elia Ardyan;Wisnu Sancoyo;Oky Tira Ayuda;Deni Setiadi;Fenti Winda Sari;Atika Ayu Ismawati;Novita Yuniarti;Hafiz Kurniawan;Winata .
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 155-164
225 views Abstract
2015
sikap, motivasi, dan minat berwirausaha mahasiswa
;Rosmiati Rosmiati;Donny Teguh Santosa Junias;Munawar Munawar
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 21-30
223 views Abstract
2014
keterkaitan atmospheric, joy dan customer loyalty pengunjung trans studio bandung
;Dewi Anggraeni;Dudi Anandya;Silvia Margaretha
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 163-174
223 views Abstract
2004
upaya mencapai loyalitas konsumen dalam perspektif sumber daya manusia
;Erna Ferrinadewi;S. Pantja Djati
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 15-26
220 views Abstract
2018
Issues and difficulties of the management of expensive drugs not included in the list in addition for a hospital dealing with cancers
Blay, J.
Vol. 202 , pp. 1003-1012
303 views
2017
the influence of individual knowledge and work team development to the manufacturing company performance of in east java
;Widjojo Suprapto
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 22-27
93 views Abstract
2016
brand awareness and brand image of decision making on university
;Herry Mulyono
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 163–173-
190 views Abstract
2015
memahami ekuitas merek perguruan tinggi: penelitian empiris pada stie surakarta, jawa tengah, indonesia
;Elia Ardyan;Wisnu Sancoyo;Oky Tira Ayuda;Deni Setiadi;Fenti Winda Sari;Atika Ayu Ismawati;Novita Yuniarti;Hafiz Kurniawan;Winata .
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 155-164
225 views Abstract
2015
sikap, motivasi, dan minat berwirausaha mahasiswa
;Rosmiati Rosmiati;Donny Teguh Santosa Junias;Munawar Munawar
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 21-30
223 views Abstract
2015
komunikasi informal, gaji, dan motivasi kerja karyawan di pt indonusa algaemas prima bali
;Cynthia Febriana;Eddy M. Sutanto
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 136-144
168 views Abstract
2014
kinerja keuangan berbasis penciptaan nilai, faktor makroekonomi, dan return saham sektor pertanian
;Arif Kurniadi;Noer Azam Achsani;Hendro Sasongko
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 141-152
25 views Abstract
2014
performance evaluation of property and real estate companies listed on indonesia stock exchange using data envelopment analysis
;Tessa V. Soetanto;Liem Pei Fun
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 121-130
237 views Abstract
2014
keterkaitan atmospheric, joy dan customer loyalty pengunjung trans studio bandung
;Dewi Anggraeni;Dudi Anandya;Silvia Margaretha
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 163-174
223 views Abstract
2013
pengaruh budaya perusahaan terhadap prestasi kerja karyawan pt pembangkitan jawa-bali surabaya unit pelayanan pemeliharaan
;Riyan Sisiawan Putra
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 131-140
297 views Abstract
Journament Score
32.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,622 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.