bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4782 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine
Abbreviated Name bulletin de l'academie nationale de medecine
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2008
perilaku wirausaha industri keramik berskala kecil untuk meningkatkan daya saing produk di malang
;Sri Hadiati
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 115-123
358 views Abstract
2018
Issues and difficulties of the management of expensive drugs not included in the list in addition for a hospital dealing with cancers
Blay, J.
Vol. 202 , pp. 1003-1012
283 views
2013
pengaruh budaya perusahaan terhadap prestasi kerja karyawan pt pembangkitan jawa-bali surabaya unit pelayanan pemeliharaan
;Riyan Sisiawan Putra
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 131-140
245 views Abstract
2008
pengaruh motivasi, persepsi dan sikap konsumen terhadap keputusan pembelian sepeda motor merek "honda" di kawasan surabaya barat
;Dewi Urip Wahyuni
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
227 views Abstract
2014
performance evaluation of property and real estate companies listed on indonesia stock exchange using data envelopment analysis
;Tessa V. Soetanto;Liem Pei Fun
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 121-130
216 views Abstract
2010
prinsip-prinsip manajemen bisnis keluarga (family business) dikaitkan dengan kedudukan mandiri perseroan terbatas (pt)
;Augustinus Simanjuntak
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 113-120
214 views Abstract
2015
sikap, motivasi, dan minat berwirausaha mahasiswa
;Rosmiati Rosmiati;Donny Teguh Santosa Junias;Munawar Munawar
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 21-30
195 views Abstract
2009
studi pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap praktik earnings management pada perusahaan terdaftar di pt bursa efek indonesia
;Werner R. Murhadi
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
194 views Abstract
2004
upaya mencapai loyalitas konsumen dalam perspektif sumber daya manusia
;Erna Ferrinadewi;S. Pantja Djati
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 15-26
188 views Abstract
2015
memahami ekuitas merek perguruan tinggi: penelitian empiris pada stie surakarta, jawa tengah, indonesia
;Elia Ardyan;Wisnu Sancoyo;Oky Tira Ayuda;Deni Setiadi;Fenti Winda Sari;Atika Ayu Ismawati;Novita Yuniarti;Hafiz Kurniawan;Winata .
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 155-164
185 views Abstract
View All 21 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.