Indexed in Journament

toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology

ISSN 1096-0929· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.6/100
Journament Score
#10,709
Journament Rank
113
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name toxicol sci
Abbreviated Name toxicol sci
ISSN 1096-0929
URL http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (113)

2011
Bisphenol A impairs follicle growth, inhibits steroidogenesis, and downregulates rate-limiting enzymes in the estradiol biosynthesis pathway.
Vol. 119 , No. 1 , pp. 209-17
704 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effects of Genotype × Phenotype Interactions on Transcriptional Response to Silver Nanoparticle Toxicity in Organotypic Cultures of Murine Tracheal Epithelial Cells.
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantitative Transcriptional Biomarkers of Xenobiotic Receptor Activation in Rat Liver for The Early Assessment of Drug Safety Liabilities.
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of zebrafish larvae and hiPSC cardiomyocytes for predicting drug induced cardiotoxicity in humans.
391 views DOI Abstract
2003
self-efficacy toward educational technology : the application in taiwan teacher education
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 409-415
359 views Abstract
2020
Impaired tubular reabsorption is the main mechanism explaining increases in urinary NGAL excretion following acute kidney injury in rats.
344 views DOI Abstract
2006
網路同儕互評在moodle系統上的應用 the application of moodle for web-based peer assessmen
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 267-284
329 views Abstract
2026
Detecting drug-induced nephrotoxicity using simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multiharmonic microscopy
DOI Abstract
2026
Integrating New Approach Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence to Advance Central Nervous System Toxicity Prediction: Lessons from Preclinical and Clinical Case Studies
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
<i>Review of in vitro</i> approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reversible disruption of proresolving lipid mediator pathways and erythroid homeostasis by PM2.5
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Towards Bayesian-based quantitative adverse outcome pathways using <i>in vitro</i> data from open literature and continuous variables: a case example for liver fibrosis
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Cerebral Metabolic Crisis, and Exploratory Bioenergetic Biomarkers in a Translational Swine Model of Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Building structure activity relationships (SAR) to avoid toxicity due to unwanted CNS ion channel activity
18 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
90
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.