Indexed in Journament

toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology

ISSN 1096-0929· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #516 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
133 Articles
Scores higher than 98.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name toxicol sci
Abbreviated Name toxicol sci
ISSN 1096-0929
URL http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.2
Content Distribution 17.0 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (133)

2011
Bisphenol A impairs follicle growth, inhibits steroidogenesis, and downregulates rate-limiting enzymes in the estradiol biosynthesis pathway.
Vol. 119 , No. 1 , pp. 209-17
720 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.
481 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effects of Genotype × Phenotype Interactions on Transcriptional Response to Silver Nanoparticle Toxicity in Organotypic Cultures of Murine Tracheal Epithelial Cells.
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantitative Transcriptional Biomarkers of Xenobiotic Receptor Activation in Rat Liver for The Early Assessment of Drug Safety Liabilities.
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of zebrafish larvae and hiPSC cardiomyocytes for predicting drug induced cardiotoxicity in humans.
403 views DOI Abstract
2003
self-efficacy toward educational technology : the application in taiwan teacher education
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 409-415
368 views Abstract
2020
Impaired tubular reabsorption is the main mechanism explaining increases in urinary NGAL excretion following acute kidney injury in rats.
359 views DOI Abstract
2006
網路同儕互評在moodle系統上的應用 the application of moodle for web-based peer assessmen
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 267-284
343 views Abstract
2026
Deposition of polyethylene micro- and nano-plastics is associated with accumulation of cadmium in lungs of smokers: A pilot study
DOI Abstract
2026
Analytical Choices Drive Toxicogenomic Potency Estimates: A Systematic Evaluation of Transcriptomic Points of Departure
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Assessing drug-induced liver injury liabilities in human and animal hepatocytes under static and perfused spheroid culture conditions
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
ToxCompl Completion of the DrugMatrix Toxicogenomics Database: An Integrated Resource for Toxicological Hypothesis Generation
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cigarette Smoke and E-Cigarette Aerosol Extracts Induce Myelopoiesis and Suppress Inflammatory Cytokine Production
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Journament Score
43.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #516 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.