toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1315 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name toxicol sci
Abbreviated Name toxicol sci
ISSN 1096-0929
Aim and Scope
URL http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (78 total)

2011
Bisphenol A impairs follicle growth, inhibits steroidogenesis, and downregulates rate-limiting enzymes in the estradiol biosynthesis pathway.
Peretz, Jackye;Gupta, Rupesh K;Singh, Jeffrey;Hernández-Ochoa, Isabel;Flaws, Jodi A;
Vol. 119 , No. 1 , pp. 209-17
631 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.
Friedman, Katie Paul;Gagne, Matthew;Loo, Lit-Hsin;Karamertzanis, Panagiotis;Netzeva, Tatiana;Sobanski, Tomasz;Franzosa, Jill;Richard, Ann;Lougee, Ryan;Gissi, Andrea;Lee, Jia-Ying Joey;Angrish, Michelle;Dorne, Jean-Lou;Foster, Stiven;Raffaele, Kathleen;Bahadori, Tina;Gwinn, Maureen;Lambert, Jason;Whelan, Maurice;Rasenberg, Mike;Barton-Maclaren, Tara;Thomas, Russell S;
431 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Critical Role of X Chromosome-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis (XIAP) in Differential Synergism Induced by Pentachlorophenol and Copper-1,10-phenanthroline Complex in Normal and Cancer Liver Cells.
Sheng, Zhi-Guo;Shen, Chen;Fan, Rui-Mei;Chao, Xi-Juan;Liu, Yu-Xiang;Zhu, Ben-Zhan;
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effects of Genotype × Phenotype Interactions on Transcriptional Response to Silver Nanoparticle Toxicity in Organotypic Cultures of Murine Tracheal Epithelial Cells.
Nicholas, Tyler P;Haick, Anoria K;Bammler, Theo K;Workman, Tomomi W;Kavanagh, Terrance J;Faustman, Elaine M;Gharib, Sina A;Altemeier, William A;
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of zebrafish larvae and hiPSC cardiomyocytes for predicting drug induced cardiotoxicity in humans.
Dyballa, Sylvia;Miñana, Rafael;Rubio-Brotons, Maria;Cornet, Carles;Pederzani, Tiziana;Escaramis, Georgia;Garcia-Serna, Ricard;Mestres, Jordi;Terriente, Javier;
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantitative Transcriptional Biomarkers of Xenobiotic Receptor Activation in Rat Liver for The Early Assessment of Drug Safety Liabilities.
Podtelezhnikov, Alexei A;Monroe, James J;Aslamkhan, Amy G;Pearson, Kara;Qin, Chunhua;Tamburino, Alex M;Loboda, Andrey P;Glaab, Warren E;Sistare, Frank D;Tanis, Keith Q;
355 views DOI Abstract
2003
self-efficacy toward educational technology : the application in taiwan teacher education
;Wanyu Chao
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 409-415
317 views Abstract
2020
Impaired tubular reabsorption is the main mechanism explaining increases in urinary NGAL excretion following acute kidney injury in rats.
Sancho-Martínez, Sandra M;Blanco-Gozalo, Víctor;Quiros, Yaremi;Prieto-García, Laura;Montero-Gómez, María J;Docherty, Neil G;Martínez-Salgado, Carlos;Morales, Ana I;López-Novoa, José M;López-Hernández, Francisco J;
314 views DOI Abstract
1999
醫學圖書館網路資源合作館藏發展 internet resources cooperative collection development in medical library
;Shwu-jiun Wang
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 477-497
314 views Abstract
2006
網路同儕互評在moodle系統上的應用 the application of moodle for web-based peer assessmen
;Ching-Heng Shen;Xin-Yi Huang
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 267-284
288 views Abstract
View All 78 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.