Indexed in Journament

toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology

ISSN 1096-0929· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.6/100
Journament Score
#8,201
Journament Rank
103
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name toxicol sci
Abbreviated Name toxicol sci
ISSN 1096-0929
URL http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (103)

2011
Bisphenol A impairs follicle growth, inhibits steroidogenesis, and downregulates rate-limiting enzymes in the estradiol biosynthesis pathway.
Vol. 119 , No. 1 , pp. 209-17
670 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effects of Genotype × Phenotype Interactions on Transcriptional Response to Silver Nanoparticle Toxicity in Organotypic Cultures of Murine Tracheal Epithelial Cells.
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of zebrafish larvae and hiPSC cardiomyocytes for predicting drug induced cardiotoxicity in humans.
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantitative Transcriptional Biomarkers of Xenobiotic Receptor Activation in Rat Liver for The Early Assessment of Drug Safety Liabilities.
380 views DOI Abstract
2003
self-efficacy toward educational technology : the application in taiwan teacher education
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 409-415
351 views Abstract
2020
Impaired tubular reabsorption is the main mechanism explaining increases in urinary NGAL excretion following acute kidney injury in rats.
336 views DOI Abstract
2006
網路同儕互評在moodle系統上的應用 the application of moodle for web-based peer assessmen
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 267-284
316 views Abstract
2026
Hepatic Responses as Potential Biomarkers of Idiosyncratic Drug Reaction Risk
DOI Abstract
2026
Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Altered Rat Sperm Small RNAs with Critical Developmental Roles
DOI Abstract
2026
Integrating Mechanistic Data to Contextualize <i>in Vivo</i> Apical Observations Using the Developmental Neurotoxicity <i>in Vitro</i> Battery
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Systematic comparison of temporal hepatotoxicant-induced gene network responses across three liver test systems
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Investigation of a Metabolism-Dependent Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Off-Target Activation for a Drug Development Candidate and a Screening Strategy for De-Risking Backups
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Environmental Benzene Exposure Induces a Conserved Neutrophil Degranulation Program Across Species
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Beyond Respiratory Depression: Acute and delayed pulmonary responses following aerosolized fentanyl exposure
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Molecular Dosimetry of DNA Adducts in Mice Exposed to Ethylene Oxide
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator 2: A Forgotten Per-ARNT-Sim Transcription Factor
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Exposure timing is a determinant of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pulmonary, vascular and metabolic toxicity in male mice
5 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
90
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.