Indexed in Journament

JAMA

ISSN 1538-3598· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,092 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
149 Articles
Scores higher than 41.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name JAMA
Abbreviated Name jama
ISSN 1538-3598
URL http://jama.ama-assn.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for JAMA
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 62.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (149)

2003
Effect of serologic status and cesarean delivery on transmission rates of herpes simplex virus from mother to infant
Vol. 289 , No. 2 , pp. -
709 views Abstract
2003
Effect of Serologic Status and Cesarean Delivery on Transmission Rates of Herpes Simplex Virus From Mother to Infant
Vol. 289 , No. 2 , pp. 203-209
667 views Abstract
1993
Cesarean delivery for women presenting with genital herpes lesions. Efficacy, risks, and costs
Vol. 270 , No. 1 , pp. -
611 views Abstract
1989
Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations
Vol. 262 , No. 19 , pp. -
563 views Abstract
1998
Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT Study Group
Vol. 280 , No. 13 , pp. -
536 views Abstract
2005
External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury
Vol. 294 , No. 12 , pp. -
535 views Abstract
2001
Effect of condoms on reducing the transmission of herpes simplex virus type 2 from men to women
Vol. 285 , No. 24 , pp. -
529 views Abstract
2018
Global Mortality From Firearms, 1990-2016.
Vol. 320 , No. 8 , pp. 792-814
526 views DOI Abstract
1983
Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in King County, Washington. Increasing incidence and epidemiologic correlates
Vol. 250 , No. 22 , pp. -
519 views Abstract
1999
Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense
Vol. 281 , No. 18 , pp. -
517 views Abstract
2024
RNA Interference With Zilebesiran for Mild to Moderate Hypertension: The KARDIA-1 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Vol. 331 , No. 9 , pp. 740-749
125 views DOI Abstract
2023
Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.
Vol. 329 , No. 1 , pp. 39-51
167 views DOI Abstract
2023
Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Initiation on Organ Support-Free Days in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Vol. 329 , No. 14 , pp. 1183-1196
53 views DOI Abstract
2023
Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Two Harmonized Randomized Clinical Trials.
Vol. 330 , No. 18 , pp. 1745-1759
92 views DOI Abstract
2022
Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy on Survival and Organ Support-Free Days in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Vol. 327 , No. 13 , pp. 1247-1259
112 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
Vol. 323 , No. 22 , pp. 2249-2251
136 views Abstract
2020
Allocation of COVID-19 Relief Funding to Disproportionately Black Counties.
257 views DOI
2020
Oncology Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
363 views DOI
2020
Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China.
337 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,092 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.