JAMA | Journament

Journal Ranking

#991 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

JAMA

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name JAMA
Abbreviated Name jama
ISSN 1538-3598
Aim and Scope
URL http://jama.ama-assn.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (148 total)

1993
Cesarean delivery for women presenting with genital herpes lesions. Efficacy, risks, and costs
Vol. 270 , No. 1 , pp. -
548 views Abstract
2003
Effect of serologic status and cesarean delivery on transmission rates of herpes simplex virus from mother to infant
Vol. 289 , No. 2 , pp. -
527 views Abstract
1989
Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations
Vol. 262 , No. 19 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
2003
Effect of Serologic Status and Cesarean Delivery on Transmission Rates of Herpes Simplex Virus From Mother to Infant
Vol. 289 , No. 2 , pp. 203-209
477 views Abstract
1999
Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense
Vol. 281 , No. 18 , pp. -
473 views Abstract
2005
External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury
Vol. 294 , No. 12 , pp. -
464 views Abstract
2001
Effect of condoms on reducing the transmission of herpes simplex virus type 2 from men to women
Vol. 285 , No. 24 , pp. -
462 views Abstract
1983
Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in King County, Washington. Increasing incidence and epidemiologic correlates
Vol. 250 , No. 22 , pp. -
459 views Abstract
1998
Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT Study Group
Vol. 280 , No. 13 , pp. -
452 views Abstract
1985
Ribavirin treatment of respiratory syncytial viral infection in infants with underlying cardiopulmonary disease
Vol. 254 , No. 21 , pp. -
437 views Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.