Indexed in Journament

ama journal of ethics

ISSN 2376-6980· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,073 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
102 Articles
Scores higher than 14.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ama j ethics
Abbreviated Name ama j ethics
ISSN 2376-6980

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 68.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 22.9
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 21.3
Innovation 36.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.9 4.1
Content Distribution 68.1 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (102)

2019
Genome Editing, Ethics, and Politics.
Gabel, Isabel;Moreno, Jonathan;
Vol. 21 , No. 12 , pp. E1105-1110
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
Best Practices for Partnering with Ethnic Minority-Serving Religious Organizations on Health Promotion and Prevention.
Islam, Nadia;Patel, Shilpa;
Vol. 20 , No. 7 , pp. E643-654
383 views DOI Abstract
2017
How should therapeutic decisions about expensive drugs be made in imperfect environments?
Fleck, L.
Vol. 19 , pp. 147-156
382 views DOI
2017
Art Therapy Exhibitions: Exploitation or Advocacy?
Davis, Terri;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 98-106
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Representing Communication, Compassion, and Competence in the Era of AI.
Yaghy, Antonio;Shields, Jerry A;Shields, Carol L;
Vol. 21 , No. 11 , pp. E1009-1013
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Diagnosis Codes for Human Trafficking Can Help Assess Incidence, Risk Factors, and Comorbid Illness and Injury.
Macias-Konstantopoulos, Wendy L;
Vol. 20 , No. 12 , pp. E1143-1151
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facilitating Critical Self-Exploration by Global Health Students.
Ventres, William B;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. E749-758
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why Are Biosimilars Not Living up to Their Promise in the US?
Zhai, Mike Z;Sarpatwari, Ameet;Kesselheim, Aaron S;
Vol. 21 , No. 8 , pp. E668-678
322 views DOI Abstract
2013
a hybrid monte carlo ant colony optimization approach for protein structure prediction in the hp model
;Giancarlo Mauri;Andrea G. Citrolo
Vol. 130 , No. Proc. Wivace 2013 , pp. 61-69
318 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trafficked.
Wood, Stephen P;
Vol. 20 , No. 12 , pp. E1212-1216
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Representing Communication, Compassion, and Competence in the Era of AI.
Yaghy, Antonio;Shields, Jerry A;Shields, Carol L;
Vol. 21 , No. 11 , pp. E1009-1013
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genome Editing, Ethics, and Politics.
Gabel, Isabel;Moreno, Jonathan;
Vol. 21 , No. 12 , pp. E1105-1110
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facilitating Critical Self-Exploration by Global Health Students.
Ventres, William B;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. E749-758
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why Are Biosimilars Not Living up to Their Promise in the US?
Zhai, Mike Z;Sarpatwari, Ameet;Kesselheim, Aaron S;
Vol. 21 , No. 8 , pp. E668-678
322 views DOI Abstract
2018
Diagnosis Codes for Human Trafficking Can Help Assess Incidence, Risk Factors, and Comorbid Illness and Injury.
Macias-Konstantopoulos, Wendy L;
Vol. 20 , No. 12 , pp. E1143-1151
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trafficked.
Wood, Stephen P;
Vol. 20 , No. 12 , pp. E1212-1216
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
Who should regulate preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the United States?
Bayefsky, M.
Vol. 20 , pp. E1160-E1167
125 views DOI
2018
Best Practices for Partnering with Ethnic Minority-Serving Religious Organizations on Health Promotion and Prevention.
Islam, Nadia;Patel, Shilpa;
Vol. 20 , No. 7 , pp. E643-654
383 views DOI Abstract
2017
proof diagrams for multiplicative linear logic
;Matteo Acclavio
Vol. 238 , No. Proc. LINEARITY 2016 , pp. 11-23
178 views DOI Abstract
2017
Art Therapy Exhibitions: Exploitation or Advocacy?
Davis, Terri;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 98-106
333 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,073 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

26.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.