Indexed in Journament

journal of experimental psychology: learning memory and cognition

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.5/100
Journament Score
#12,859
Journament Rank
46
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name journal of experimental psychology: learning memory and cognition
Abbreviated Name journal of experimental psychology: learning memory and cognition

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2009
relações estado-sociedade no brasil: representações para uso de reformadores
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 161-199
432 views DOI Abstract
interdisciplinarity in french social sciences scientific journals
Vol. 60 , No. 3 , pp. 867-894
312 views DOI Abstract
a difícil institucionalização da ciência política italiana: de muratori a mussolini
Vol. 60 , No. 3 , pp. 793-823
289 views DOI Abstract
2014
a recepção controversa de max weber no brasil (1940-1980)
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 5-33
256 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Delay Influences Search Processes at Test
, pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
quem é classe média no brasil? um estudo sobre identidades de classe*
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 111-149
249 views DOI Abstract
2003
sistemas nacionais de inteligência: origens, lógica de expansão e configuração atual
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 75-127
237 views Abstract
2002
por que se importar com a desigualdade
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 649-675
230 views Abstract
2015
o estado (de bem-estar social) como ator do desenvolvimento: uma história das ideias
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 581-615
229 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Delay Influences Search Processes at Test
, pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2015
o estado (de bem-estar social) como ator do desenvolvimento: uma história das ideias
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 581-615
229 views DOI Abstract
2015
biopolítica e desenvolvimento? foucault e agamben sobre estado, governo e violência
Vol. 58 , No. 2 , pp. 537-567
133 views DOI Abstract
2014
a polêmica do aborto e o 3º programa nacional de direitos humanos
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 237-275
160 views DOI Abstract
2014
tipos e dinâmicas de mudança institucional: as agências reguladoras de transportes no brasil
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 855-885
143 views DOI Abstract
2014
o efeito das emendas ao orçamento no comportamento parlamentar e a dimensão temporal: velhas teses, novos testes
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 817-853
123 views DOI Abstract
2014
a recepção controversa de max weber no brasil (1940-1980)
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 5-33
256 views DOI Abstract
2013
da compra de produtos e serviços culturais ao direito de produzir cultura: análise de um paradigma emergente
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 351-382
102 views DOI Abstract
2012
guillermo o'donnell e sua contribuição para o desenvolvimento da ciência política latino-americana
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 5-35
125 views DOI Abstract
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.