Journal of genetic counseling | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4358 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Journal of genetic counseling

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name J Genet Couns
Abbreviated Name journal of genetic counseling
ISSN 1573-3599
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15733599
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (74 total)

2020
Summary report of the 2019 Diversity and Inclusion Task Force of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Channaoui, Nadine;Khan, Ambreen;Wiesman, Chana;Bui, Kara;Cunningham, Mitch;Brown, Kaitlyn;Wolfe Schneider, Kami;Platt, Kristal;Hodges, Priscila Delgado;Thompson, Nicole;Haas, Bruce;Strang, Katie;Carey, Meghan;Ramos, Erica;Arjunan, Aishwarya;Platt, Julia;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 192-201
545 views DOI Abstract
1987
estudo comparativo e variação sazonal da ictiofauna na zona entremarés do mar casado-guarujá e mar pequeno-são vicente, sp comparative study and seasonal variations of the ichthyofauna of the surf zone in mar casado-guaruja and mar pequeno-são vicente, sp
;Alfredo Martins Paiva Filho;Ana Paula Toscano
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 153-165
502 views DOI Abstract
2019
An ethical framework for genetic counseling in the genomic era.
Jamal, Leila;Schupmann, Will;Berkman, Benjamin E;
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests
Amendola, L.
, pp. 0-0
420 views DOI
2020
Ethical and professional challenges encountered by Japanese healthcare professionals who provide genetic counseling services.
Yoshida, Akiko;Nakada, Haruka;Inaba, Akira;Takahashi, Masayo;
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
"I am a Genetic Counselor": A qualitative exploration of field leaders' perceptions of the title "genetic counselor".
Means, Chandler;Cirino, Allison;Swenson, Kathleen B;Austin, Jehannine;
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing efficiency and skill utilization: Analysis of genetic counselors' attitudes regarding delegation in a clinical setting.
Read, Parker;Yashar, Beverly M;Robinson, Linda;Marvin, Monica;
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 67-77
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Further validation of the Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES): Its relationship with personality characteristics.
Keller, Haley;Wusik, Katie;He, Hua;Yager, Geoffrey;Atzinger, Carrie;
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
Facing the challenge of genetic counselors' need for rapid continuing education about genomic technologies.
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D;Lamb Thrush, Devon;Freeze, Samantha;Dorsainville, Darnelle L;Eichmeyer, Jennifer;Banks, Kimberly C;, ;
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary care physicians' understanding and utilization of pediatric exome sequencing results.
Mazzola, Sarah E;O'Connor, Bridget;Yashar, Beverly M;
376 views DOI Abstract
View All 74 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.