bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2072 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name bmc sports sci med rehabil
Abbreviated Name bmc sports sci med rehabil
ISSN 2052-1847
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13102
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2019
Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review.
Meigh, Neil J;Keogh, Justin W L;Schram, Ben;Hing, Wayne A;
Vol. 11 , pp. 19
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hannan, Amanda L;Harders, Michael P;Hing, Wayne;Climstein, Mike;Coombes, Jeff S;Furness, James;
Vol. 11 , pp. 14
378 views DOI Abstract
multiculturalismos: essencialismo e antiessencialismo em kymlicka, young e parekh
;Luiz Augusto Campos
Vol. 18 , No. 42 , pp. 266-293
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relaxation and exercise in lymphoma survivors (REIL study): a randomised clinical trial protocol.
Hathiramani, Suchita;Pettengell, Ruth;Moir, Hannah;Younis, Ahmed;
Vol. 11 , pp. 17
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Factors associated with non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Borg, Sabina;Öberg, Birgitta;Leosdottir, Margret;Lindholm, Daniel;Nilsson, Lennart;Bäck, Maria;
Vol. 11 , pp. 24
320 views DOI Abstract
2008
criatividade, comunicação e produção do saber creativity, communication and knowledge production
;Arnaud Sales
, No. 19 , pp. 22-39
316 views DOI Abstract
2008
controle social expresso em representações sociais de violência, insegurança e medo social control expressed in social representations of violence, insecurity and fear
;M. Margarita Rosa Gaviria
, No. 20 , pp. 72-107
288 views DOI Abstract
2010
a naturalização da identidade social precarizada na indústria do alumínio primário paraense the acknowledgment of the precarious social identity in the primary aluminum industry in the state of pará, brazil
;Attila Magno e Silva Barbosa
, No. 23 , pp. 268-303
278 views DOI Abstract
2006
representações sociais, instituições e conflitos na gestão de águas em territórios rurais social representations, institutions, and conflicts in water management in rural territories
;Rodrigo Constante Martins
, No. 15 , pp. 288-325
265 views DOI Abstract
trabalho, globalização e contramovimentos: dinâmicas da ação coletiva do precariado artístico no brasil e em portugal
;Ruy Braga;Joana Marques
Vol. 19 , No. 45 , pp. 52-80
265 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.