Indexed in Journament

bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation

ISSN 2052-1847· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,280 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 10.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bmc sports sci med rehabil
Abbreviated Name bmc sports sci med rehabil
ISSN 2052-1847
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13102

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 32.0 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 67.5 30.1
Community Impact 12.9 11.5
Content Distribution 50.9 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2019
Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review.
Vol. 11 , pp. 19
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 11 , pp. 14
425 views DOI Abstract
multiculturalismos: essencialismo e antiessencialismo em kymlicka, young e parekh
Vol. 18 , No. 42 , pp. 266-293
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Factors associated with non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Vol. 11 , pp. 24
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relaxation and exercise in lymphoma survivors (REIL study): a randomised clinical trial protocol.
Vol. 11 , pp. 17
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Factors associated with non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Vol. 11 , pp. 24
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review.
Vol. 11 , pp. 19
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relaxation and exercise in lymphoma survivors (REIL study): a randomised clinical trial protocol.
Vol. 11 , pp. 17
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 11 , pp. 14
425 views DOI Abstract
2015
a secularização conduz à decadência moral?
Vol. 17 , No. 39 , pp. 224-246
21 views DOI Abstract
2015
a américa latina indivisível: a influência do positivismo no projeto intelectual de josé enrique rodó
Vol. 17 , No. 40 , pp. 380-414
174 views DOI Abstract
2015
tendências e desafios contemporâneos da sociologia política
Vol. 17 , No. 38 , pp. 14-17
125 views DOI
2014
la reinvención de la autenticidad en el contexto de la mercantilización neoliberal
Vol. 16 , No. 35 , pp. 166-201
159 views DOI Abstract
2014
josué de castro e a agricultura de sustentação em geografia da fome
Vol. 16 , No. 35 , pp. 306-338
21 views DOI Abstract
2014
visiones sobre los tránsitos socio-técnicos hacia patrones de consumo sustentable en agua y energía en la minería sudamericana - dos controversias argentinas
Vol. 16 , No. 37 , pp. 72-111
185 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,280 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

67.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.