Indexed in Journament

Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica

ISSN 1001-5302· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,457 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 81.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi
Abbreviated Name zhongguo zhong yao za zhi
ISSN 1001-5302

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 13.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 71.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 13.6 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.4
Content Distribution 71.9 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2019
[Quantitative proteomics of inhibitory mechanism of Dendrobium denneanum ether extract on lung cancer cells].
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 765-773
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of knowledge acquisition behavior of traditional Chinese medicine based on internet].
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 2416-2420
428 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Determination of flavonoids constituents in epimedium total flavone capsule and research on its anti-osteoporosis activity].
Vol. 43 , No. 15 , pp. 3140-3144
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Study on polysaccharide content and monosaccharide composition of Polyporus umbellatus from different production areas].
Vol. 44 , No. 17 , pp. 3608-3614
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of Chinese citizens' traditional Chinese medicine health culture literacy level and its influence factors in 2017].
Vol. 44 , No. 13 , pp. 2865-2870
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Research progress and secondary development ideas of Astragali Radix polysaccharides for injection].
Vol. 44 , No. 13 , pp. 2736-2741
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Application prospect of new technology and new equipment in production of Chinese patent medicine].
Vol. 44 , No. 21 , pp. 4560-4565
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Correlation between rhizospheric microorganisms distribution and alkaloid content of Fritillaria taipaiensis].
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 2231-2235
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
[Application characteristics and situation analysis of volatile oils in database of Chinese patent medicine]
Vol. 39 , No. 17 , pp. -
316 views Abstract
2019
[Comparative study on quality of decoction pieces of Saposhnikovia divaricata with different growth patterns and years and thinking of standard of decoction pieces of S. divaricata in Chinese Pharmacopoeia].
Vol. 44 , No. 18 , pp. 4034-4042
311 views DOI Abstract
2023
[Effects and mechanisms of total flavones of Abelmoschus manihot in inhibiting podocyte necroptosis and renal fibrosis in diabetic kidney disease].
Vol. 48 , No. 15 , pp. 4137-4146
155 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis and evaluation of nutrient composition of Ophiopogonis Radix in Santai area].
Vol. 44 , No. 15 , pp. 3226-3232
131 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Research on grade standard and quality evaluation of Pinelliae Rhizoma for merchandise specification].
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 2219-2225
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Application prospect of new technology and new equipment in production of Chinese patent medicine].
Vol. 44 , No. 21 , pp. 4560-4565
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Comparative study on quality of decoction pieces of Saposhnikovia divaricata with different growth patterns and years and thinking of standard of decoction pieces of S. divaricata in Chinese Pharmacopoeia].
Vol. 44 , No. 18 , pp. 4034-4042
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Study on polysaccharide content and monosaccharide composition of Polyporus umbellatus from different production areas].
Vol. 44 , No. 17 , pp. 3608-3614
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Introduction to Professor Ma Guiqin's experience in treatment of occupational pneumoconiosis].
Vol. 44 , No. 13 , pp. 2871-2874
253 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of knowledge acquisition behavior of traditional Chinese medicine based on internet].
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. 2416-2420
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of Chinese citizens' traditional Chinese medicine health culture literacy level and its influence factors in 2017].
Vol. 44 , No. 13 , pp. 2865-2870
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Research progress and secondary development ideas of Astragali Radix polysaccharides for injection].
Vol. 44 , No. 13 , pp. 2736-2741
341 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,457 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

13.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.