journal of foot and ankle research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#936 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

journal of foot and ankle research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name j foot ankle res
Abbreviated Name j foot ankle res
ISSN 1757-1146
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13047
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2019
The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review.
Casey, Sarah;Lanting, Sean;Oldmeadow, Christopher;Chuter, Vivienne;
Vol. 12 , pp. 39
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of heel lifts versus calf muscle eccentric exercise for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy (the HEALTHY trial): study protocol for a randomised trial
Rabusin, Chantel L.;Menz, Hylton B.;McClelland, Jodie A.;Evans, Angela M.;Landorf, Karl B.;Malliaras, Peter;Docking, Sean I.;Munteanu, Shannon E.;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
361 views Abstract
2019
The lived experience of people with diabetes using off-the-shelf prescription footwear in Singapore: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Tan, Sheena;Horobin, Hazel;Tunprasert, Thanaporn;
Vol. 12 , pp. 19
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Commitment devices in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Jarl, Gustav;
Vol. 12 , pp. 44
301 views DOI Abstract
2014
effect of the building act 2011 on compliance costs in western australia
;Elizabeth Bazen
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 41-56
296 views DOI Abstract
2014
construction contractors involvement in disaster management planning
;Peter Stringfellow
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 120-132
296 views DOI Abstract
2013
a new approach for modelling variability in residential construction projects
;Mehrdad Arashpour;Ron Wakefield;Nick Blismas;EWM lee
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 83-92
293 views DOI Abstract
2012
the inherent building energy-cost relationship: an analysis of thirty melbourne case studies
;Yu Lay Langston;Craig Langston
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 9-18
269 views DOI Abstract
2012
the impact of culture on international management: a survey of project communications in singapore
;Dun Tran;Martin Skitmore
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 36-47
249 views DOI Abstract
2012
aspects of market differentiation in the building industry
;Ai-Lin Teo;Goran Runeson
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 14-23
232 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.