lontar komputer | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2909 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

lontar komputer

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name lontar komputer
Abbreviated Name lontar komputer
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (78 total)

2013
relationship between hbv dna and hbeag in serum and hbcag and inflammation grade in liver tissue among patients with chronic hepatitis b
;LIU Xingxiang
Vol. 29 , No. 12 , pp. 919-921
510 views DOI Abstract
2016
effects of nucleos(t)ide analogues on estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine level in patients with chronic hepatitis b
;XU Yong;Feng Jihong
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 279-283
346 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical effect of esophageal variceal ligation in treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis
;ZHANG Dongxu;LUO Ziyi
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 76-81
302 views DOI Abstract
2013
pi3k/akt signaling pathway and hepatic fibrosis
;PAN Peng
Vol. 29 , No. 5 , pp. 389-392
281 views Abstract
2016
effect of splenectomy on liver cirrhosis and related surgical issues
;KONG Degang;LU Shichun
Vol. 32 , No. 12 , pp. 2383-2386
268 views DOI Abstract
2013
potential of g-csf supplementation to counter the neutrophil effects of standard peg-ifnα plus ribavirin combination therapy for treating hcv-related cirrhosis
;ZHANG Sumei
Vol. 29 , No. 5 , pp. 348-351
265 views Abstract
2013
clinical trial of telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis b in patients during the third trimester of pregnancy
;JIANG Xiunong
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 101-104
253 views Abstract
2015
association between pi3k/akt/mtor/p70s6k signaling pathway and hepatic fibrosis
;WU Changhui;SHEN Min;LI Long
Vol. 31 , No. 11 , pp. 1928-1932
252 views DOI Abstract
2014
efficacy of antiviral therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with high hbv-dna levels after radical resection
;DING Chen
Vol. 30 , No. 7 , pp. 656-659
248 views DOI Abstract
2013
case of subacute liver failure due to hyperthyroidism
;JING Jing
Vol. 29 , No. 9 , pp. 707-708
238 views DOI
View All 78 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.