Indexed in Journament

lontar komputer

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3/100
Journament Score
#7,827
Journament Rank
78
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name lontar komputer
Abbreviated Name lontar komputer
ISSN 0000-0000

Publications Per Year

Articles (78)

2013
pi3k/akt signaling pathway and hepatic fibrosis
Vol. 29 , No. 5 , pp. 389-392
464 views Abstract
2016
effect of splenectomy on liver cirrhosis and related surgical issues
Vol. 32 , No. 12 , pp. 2383-2386
282 views DOI Abstract
2015
association between pi3k/akt/mtor/p70s6k signaling pathway and hepatic fibrosis
Vol. 31 , No. 11 , pp. 1928-1932
275 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical effect of plasma perfusion combined with plasma exchange in treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 715-718
254 views DOI Abstract
2018
sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma:a case report
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 594-595
187 views DOI
2018
a case of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 614-615
147 views DOI
2018
research advances in surgical treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 645-648
183 views DOI Abstract
2018
a case of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 599-601
97 views DOI
2018
a case of systemic light - chain amyloidosis
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 610-611
157 views DOI
2017
clinical effect of plasma perfusion combined with plasma exchange in treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 715-718
254 views DOI Abstract
2017
an excerpt of hepatitis b and pregnancy (society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of canada, 2017)
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. 1663-1667
75 views DOI
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.