scientia agricola | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2943 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 2 semaines

scientia agricola

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
doaj ulakbim
Nom Abrégé scientia agricola
Nom Abrégé scientia agricola
ISSN 0000-0000
Objectifs et Portée
URL
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2003
Co2 and irrigation in relation to yield and water use of the bell pepper crop Co2 e irrigação na produção e uso da água para cultura do pimentão
Rezende, Fátima Conceição;Frizzone, José Antonio;Oliveira, Ricardo Ferraz de;Pereira, Anderson Soares;
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 7-12
471 views Abstract
0000
Intercropping Acacia mangium stimulates AMF colonization and soil phosphatase activity in Eucalyptus grandis
Bini, Daniel;Santos, Cristiane Alcantara dos;Silva, Mylenne Calcciolari Pinheiro da;Bonfim, Joice Andrade;Cardoso, Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira;
Vol. 75 , No. 2 , pp. 102-110
429 views Abstract
2010
Improving detection of dairy cow estrus using fuzzy logic Melhoria da detecção do estro de vacas leiteiras por meio da lógica fuzzy
Brunassi, Leandro dos Anjos;Moura, Daniella Jorge de;Nääs, Irenilza de Alencar;Vale, Marcos Martinez do;Souza, Silvia Regina Lucas de;Lima, Karla Andrea Oliveira de;Carvalho, Thayla Morandi Ridolfi de;Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas;
Vol. 67 , No. 5 , pp. 503-509
388 views Abstract
2019
Common bean resistance expression to whitefly in winter and rainy seasons in Brazil
da, Silva A.
Vol. 76 , pp. 389-397
371 views DOI
2020
Applying the NDVI from satellite images in delimiting management zones for annual crops
Damian, J.
Vol. 77 , pp. 0-0
368 views DOI
2000
Absorção e infiltração de água por raízes de batata-doce, através de ferimentos durante a lavagem Water absorption and infiltration in sweet-potato wound roots during washing
Calbo, Adonai Gimenez;Nery, Amauri Alves;
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 547-551
358 views Abstract
2019
Phenotyping for angular leaf spot severity and its implication in breeding common bean for resistance
Pereira, R.
Vol. 76 , pp. 415-423
340 views DOI
2009
Genetic parameters for post weaning growth of Nellore cattle using polinomyals and trigonometric functions in random regression models Parâmetros genéticos para crescimento pós-desmame de bovinos Nelore por meio de funções polinomiais e trigonométricas em modelos de regressão aleatória
Macedo, Osmar Jesus;Barbin, Décio;Mourão, Gerson Barreto;
Vol. 66 , No. 4 , pp. 522-528
340 views Abstract
2019
Soil quality indicators under management systems in a Quilombola community in the Brazilian Cerrado
Silva, A.
Vol. 76 , pp. 518-526
327 views DOI
2000
Cor de feijão vagem fresco e processado após aplicação de cálcio Color of fresh and processed snap bean pods after calcium application
Fávaro, Simone Palma;Sá, Marcela Colognesi de;Ida, Elza Iouko;Neto, José Antônio Braga;
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 561-563
327 views Abstract
View All 26 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

41.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.