chemical engineering transactions | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1421 / 33,943
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

chemical engineering transactions

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name chemical engineering transactions
Abbreviated Name chemical engineering transactions
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.cetjournal.it
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2014
effect of the extraction solvent on the oleuropein content and antioxidant properties of olive leaf (cv. oblica, lastovka and levantinka) extracts
;M. Gotovac;Višnja Katalinić;Ivana Generalić Mekinić;I. Ljubenkov;F. Burčul;Danijela Skroza
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 7-14
400 views Abstract
2019
The role of leadership in process safety management system "no process safety management system is an Island"
Levovnik, D.
Vol. 74 , pp. 1375-1381
322 views DOI
2009
copigmentation effect of phenolic compounds on red currant juice anthocyanins during storage
;Mirela Kopjar;Vlasta Piližota
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 16-20
257 views Abstract
2017
Drying and preservation of phytochemicals from elateriospermum tapos seed oil using combination of freeze drying and microwave technique
Hassan, N.
Vol. 56 , pp. 1003-1008
256 views DOI
2014
effects of olive scale (parlatoria oleae (colvée)) attack on yield, quality and fatty acid profile of virgin olive oil
;M. Krapac;Barbara Sladonja;Karolina Brkić Bubola
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
247 views Abstract
2011
influence of different extracts addition on total phenols, anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of blackberry juice during storage
;Blanka Bilić;Vlasta Piližota;Mirela Kopjar
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 9-15
242 views Abstract
2013
Human and organisational factors training as a risk management strategy in an aviation maintenance company
Cromie, S.
Vol. 33 , pp. 445-450
240 views DOI
2016
effect of baking and steaming on physicochemical and thermal properties of sweet potato puree preserved by freezing and freeze-drying
;Bernarda Svrakačić;Nela Nedić Tiban;Mirela Kopjar;Vlasta Piližota;A. Lončarić
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 90-98
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
effect of pulsed electric field and pasteurisation treatments on the rheological properties of mango nectar (mangifera indica)
;S. S. Manjunatha;A. S. Bawa;T. Kathiravan;S. Nadanasabapathi;R. Kumar
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 22-33
212 views DOI Abstract
2014
respiration rate model for mature green capsicum (capsicum annum l.) under closed aerobic atmospheric conditions
;S. K. Giri;K.V. R. Rao;Ranjeet Singh
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 110-115
204 views Abstract
View All 27 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.