revista do colegio brasileiro de cirurgioes | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3383 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

revista do colegio brasileiro de cirurgioes

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name rev col bras cir
Abbreviated Name rev col bras cir
ISSN 1809-4546
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php/script_sci_serial/pid_0100-6991/lng_en/nrm_iso
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2014
Natural history of extensive diaphragmatic injury on the right side: experimental study in rats
Rivaben, Jorge Henrique;Junior, Roberto Saad;Neto, Vicente Dorgan;Botter, Marcio;Gonçalves, Roberto;
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 267-271
608 views Abstract
2018
In-person and telemedicine course models for disaster preparedness: a comparative analysis
DORIGATTI, ALCIR ESCOCIA;PEREIRA, BRUNO MONTEIRO TAVARES;SIMÕES, ROMEO LAGES;MATSUGUMA, JULIANA RODRIGUES;CALDERAN, THIAGO RODRIGUES ARAUJO;FRAGA, GUSTAVO PEREIRA;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. -
545 views Abstract
0000
Fatores preditivos de morbidade nas ressecções pancreáticas esquerdas
Madureira, Fábio Athayde Veloso;Grès, Philippe;Vasques, Rodrigo Rodrigues;Levard, Hugues;Randone, Bruto;Gayet, Brice;
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. 496-501
491 views Abstract
2018
the effect of government debt and other determinants on economic growth: the greek experience
;Panagiotis Pegkas
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 10-
375 views DOI Abstract
Ultrasound evaluation on carpal tunnel syndrome before and after bariatric surgery.
Castro, Adham do Amaral E;Skare, Thelma Larocca;Nassif, Paulo Afonso Nunes;Sakuma, Alexandre Kaue;Ariede, Bruno Luiz;Barros, Wagner Haese;
Vol. 41 , No. 6 , pp. 426-33
363 views DOI Abstract
2013
economies: an open access journal for the field of development macroeconomics
;Ralf Fendel
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 3-5
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Safety check list in outpatient surgery teaching.
Purim, Kátia Sheylla Malta;Gonçalves, Carolina Gomes;Binotto, Lucas;Groth, Anne Karoline;Aranha Júnior, Ayrton Alves;Chibata, Mauricio;Claus, Christiano Marlo Paggi;Tsumanuma, Fernanda Keiko;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. e20192197
324 views DOI Abstract
2015
catastrophic economic consequences of healthcare payments: effects on poverty estimates in egypt, jordan, and palestine
;Ahmed Shoukry Rashad;Mesbah Fathy Sharaf
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 216-234
306 views DOI Abstract
2018
adult learning, economic growth and the distribution of income
;Peter J. Stauvermann;Ronald R. Kumar
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
286 views DOI Abstract
2018
changes in natural disaster risk: macroeconomic responses in selected latin american countries
;Marlène Isoré
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
274 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.