In-person and telemedicine course models for disaster preparedness: a comparative analysis

Clicks: 495
ID: 57461
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the students’ performance in face-to-face and telemedicine courses for the training and necessary action in disasters, using telemedicine as an effective training tool. Methods: online research conducted after the end of the course of preparation in disasters, carried out in-person, as well as by videoconference. We compared the performance of students in the in-person course and through telemedicine. Results: in the comparison of the results obtained with the pre- and post-test data between the students who attended via telemedicine and in-person, we observed that in the two modalities there was an increase in knowledge (p<0.001). We also observed no statistically significant differences in the posterior evaluation between the in-person and telemedicine courses (p=1.0), however, there was a significant difference at the pre-test evaluative moment (p<0.001). Conclusion: videoconferencing can be effectively used to train health professionals in disaster management, being able to provide adequate knowledge and become an important tool to distance reaching in continuing education.
Reference Key
dorigatti2018inpersonrevista Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors DORIGATTI, ALCIR ESCOCIA;PEREIRA, BRUNO MONTEIRO TAVARES;SIMÕES, ROMEO LAGES;MATSUGUMA, JULIANA RODRIGUES;CALDERAN, THIAGO RODRIGUES ARAUJO;FRAGA, GUSTAVO PEREIRA;
Journal revista do colegio brasileiro de cirurgioes
Year 2018
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.