Indexed in Journament

The New phytologist

ISSN 1469-8137· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,872 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
393 Articles
Scores higher than 32.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name New Phytol
Abbreviated Name new phytol
ISSN 1469-8137
URL https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698137

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for The New phytologist
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 60.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 26.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (393)

2019
Hydraulics in the 21 century.
Vol. 224 , No. 2 , pp. 537-542
461 views DOI
2019
Phytophthora infestans effector SFI3 targets potato UBK to suppress early immune transcriptional responses.
Vol. 222 , No. 1 , pp. 438-454
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recruitment of specific flavonoid B-ring hydroxylases for two independent biosynthesis pathways of flavone-derived metabolites in grasses.
Vol. 223 , No. 1 , pp. 204-219
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
High-resolution computed tomography reveals dynamics of desiccation and rehydration in fern petioles of a desiccation-tolerant fern.
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Timothy J. Brodribb.
Vol. 224 , No. 2 , pp. 568-569
427 views DOI
2019
A LysM effector subverts chitin-triggered immunity to facilitate arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Global cellulose biomass, horizontal gene transfers and domain fusions drive microbial expansin evolution.
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Shifting perspectives on the impacts of phenotypic plasticity.
Vol. 224 , No. 3 , pp. 1009-1011
414 views DOI
2019
A two genes - for - one gene interaction between Leptosphaeria maculans Brassica napus.
410 views DOI Abstract
2022
CO -induced biochemical changes in leaf volatiles decreased fire-intensity in the run-up to the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.
Vol. 235 , No. 4 , pp. 1442-1454
73 views DOI Abstract
2021
How plants get round problems: new insights into the root obstacle avoidance response.
Vol. 231 , No. 1 , pp. 8-10
148 views DOI
2020
PIN-mediated polar auxin transport facilitates root-obstacle avoidance.
Vol. 225 , No. 3 , pp. 1285-1296
125 views DOI Abstract
2020
Auxin guides roots to avoid obstacles during gravitropic growth.
Vol. 225 , No. 3 , pp. 1049-1052
162 views DOI Abstract
2020
The FUSED LEAVES1-ADHERENT1 regulatory module is required for maize cuticle development and organ separation
, pp. -
136 views Abstract
2020
Machine Learning Predicts Large Scale Declines in Native Plant Phylogenetic Diversity.
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
FungalRoot: Global online database of plant mycorrhizal associations.
250 views DOI Abstract
2020
Plant growth rate and nitrogen uptake shape rhizosphere bacterial community composition and activity in an agricultural field.
Vol. 225 , No. 2 , pp. 960-973
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Temperature and water potential co-limit stem cambial activity along a steep elevational gradient.
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Genome-wide association of volatiles reveals candidate loci for blueberry flavor.
308 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,872 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

60.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.