The New phytologist | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9407 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 11 hours ago

The New phytologist

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name New Phytol
Abbreviated Name new phytol
ISSN 1469-8137
Aim and Scope
URL https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698137
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (393 total)

2019
Why do entomologists and plant pathologists approach trophic relationships so differently? Identifying biological distinctions to foster synthesis.
Raffa, Kenneth F;Bonello, Pierluigi;Orrock, John L;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phytophthora infestans effector SFI3 targets potato UBK to suppress early immune transcriptional responses.
He, Qin;McLellan, Hazel;Hughes, Richard K;Boevink, Petra C;Armstrong, Miles;Lu, Yuan;Banfield, Mark J;Tian, Zhendong;Birch, Paul R J;
Vol. 222 , No. 1 , pp. 438-454
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recruitment of specific flavonoid B-ring hydroxylases for two independent biosynthesis pathways of flavone-derived metabolites in grasses.
Lam, Pui Ying;Lui, Andy C W;Yamamura, Masaomi;Wang, Lanxiang;Takeda, Yuri;Suzuki, Shiro;Liu, Hongjia;Zhu, Fu-Yuan;Chen, Mo-Xian;Zhang, Jianhua;Umezawa, Toshiaki;Tobimatsu, Yuki;Lo, Clive;
Vol. 223 , No. 1 , pp. 204-219
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
High-resolution computed tomography reveals dynamics of desiccation and rehydration in fern petioles of a desiccation-tolerant fern.
Holmlund, Helen I;Pratt, R Brandon;Jacobsen, Anna L;Davis, Stephen D;Pittermann, Jarmila;
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hydraulics in the 21 century.
McDowell, Nate G;Brodribb, Timothy J;Nardini, Andrea;
Vol. 224 , No. 2 , pp. 537-542
406 views DOI
2019
Timothy J. Brodribb.
Vol. 224 , No. 2 , pp. 568-569
392 views DOI
2019
A two genes - for - one gene interaction between Leptosphaeria maculans Brassica napus.
Petit-Houdenot, Yohann;Degrave, Alexandre;Meyer, Michel;Blaise, Françoise;Ollivier, Bénédicte;Marais, Claire-Line;Jauneau, Alain;Audran, Corinne;Rivas, Susana;Veneault-Fourrey, Claire;Brun, Hortense;Rouxel, Thierry;Fudal, Isabelle;Balesdent, Marie-Hélène;
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Shifting perspectives on the impacts of phenotypic plasticity.
Wadgymar, Susana M;Austen, Emily J;
Vol. 224 , No. 3 , pp. 1009-1011
381 views DOI
2019
A LysM effector subverts chitin-triggered immunity to facilitate arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Zeng, Tian;Rodriguez-Moreno, Luis;Mansurkhodzaev, Artem;Wang, Peng;van den Berg, Willy;Gasciolli, Virginie;Cottaz, Sylvain;Fort, Sébastien;Thomma, Bart P H J;Bono, Jean-Jacques;Bisseling, Ton;Limpens, Erik;
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Global cellulose biomass, horizontal gene transfers and domain fusions drive microbial expansin evolution.
Chase, William R;Zhaxybayeva, Olga;Rocha, Jorge;Cosgrove, Daniel J;Shapiro, Lori R;
368 views DOI Abstract
View All 393 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.