Indexed in Journament

enfermeria clinica

ISSN 1579-2013· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
20.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,996 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
71 Articles
Scores higher than 1.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name enferm clin
Abbreviated Name enferm clin
ISSN 1579-2013
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/enfermeria-clinica

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for enfermeria clinica
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 33.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 40.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (71)

2019
Patient assessment responses in nursing practice to enhance patient safety: A systematic review.
429 views DOI Abstract
2009
la reanudación política-emancipatoria en tiempos de globalización: como laboratorio para la salud?
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 87-102
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing Shinta's Early Deterioration Detection by using Fuzzy Logic Algorithm in Indonesia.
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
The implementation of Best Practice Guidelines in Spain through the Programme of the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®.
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
The comparison of good corporate governance on human resources performance in regional general hospital of Labuang Baji and Ibnu Sina hospital Makassar, South Sulawesi.
Vol. 30 Suppl 2 , pp. 482-486
310 views DOI Abstract
2013
famílias negras, desigualdades, saúde e saneamento básico no brasil
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 41-53
275 views DOI Abstract
2020
The comparison of good corporate governance on human resources performance in regional general hospital of Labuang Baji and Ibnu Sina hospital Makassar, South Sulawesi.
Vol. 30 Suppl 2 , pp. 482-486
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
The implementation of Best Practice Guidelines in Spain through the Programme of the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Descriptive study of the satisfaction of nursing degree students in high-fidelity clinical simulation practices.
206 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying causal risk factors for stunting in children under five years of age in South Jakarta, Indonesia.
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning styles of Malaysian Generation 'Y' healthcare undergraduates.
234 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing Shinta's Early Deterioration Detection by using Fuzzy Logic Algorithm in Indonesia.
394 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
20.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,996 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

20.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

40.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.