clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the federation of spanish oncology societies and of the national cancer institute of mexico | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9227 / 33,986
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the federation of spanish oncology societies and of the national cancer institute of mexico

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name clin transl oncol
Abbreviated Name clin transl oncol
ISSN 1699-3055
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12094
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2019
Patient safety in radiation oncology in Spain: a need to change.
Pardo Masferrer, J;Del Cerro Peñalver, E;Contreras Martinez, J;Ferrer Albiach, C;, ;
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Review of concepts in therapeutic decision-making in HER2-negative luminal metastatic breast cancer.
Alvarez-Lopez, I;Bezares, S;Dalmau Portulas, E;García-Martínez, E;García-Sáenz, J Á;Gil-Gil, M;Martínez de Dueñas, E;Ribelles, N;Santaballa Bertrán, A;
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
RNF213 suppresses carcinogenesis in glioblastoma by affecting MAPK/JNK signaling pathway.
Wang, X;Ye, M;Wu, M;Fang, H;Xiao, B;Xie, L;Zhu, X;
300 views DOI Abstract
2010
beyond learning management systems: designing for interprofessional knowledge building in the health sciences
;Leila Lax;Marlene Scardamalia;Judy Watt-Watson;Judith Hunter;Carl Bereiter
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. -
268 views DOI Abstract
2010
using videoconferencing to provide mentorship in inquiry-based urban and rural secondary classrooms
;Qing Li;Patti Dyjur;Natalya Nicholson;Lynn Moorman
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. -
256 views DOI Abstract
2009
encouraging self-regulated learning through electronic portfolios
;Philip C. Abrami;Anne Wade;Vanitha Pillay;Ofra Aslan;Eva M. Bures;Caitlin Bentley
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
234 views DOI Abstract
2009
cyberbullying in schools: an examination of preservice teachers’ perception
;Qing Li
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. -
220 views DOI Abstract
2002
effects of surrounding information and line length on text comprehension from the web
;Jess McMullin;Connie K. Varnhagen;Pheng Heng;Xornam Apedoe
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. -
205 views DOI Abstract
2005
asynchronous cmc, collaboration and the development of critical thinking in a graduate seminar in applied linguistics
;Zsuzsanna I. Abrams
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. -
202 views DOI Abstract
2002
research reports / rapports de recherche
;Ismael Rumzan;Elizabeth Hanlis
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. -
190 views DOI
View All 33 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.