Indexed in Journament

contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,754 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 8.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal
Abbreviated Name contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 59.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.1
Innovation 15.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.1 4.2
Content Distribution 59.9 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2015
“Kazakhstani” Identity, Eurasian Regionalism and Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Biopolitics of Forced Migration, Modernity and Multilateralism
Peleo, Aliya Sartbayeva;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 247-302
437 views Abstract
2017
Contextual Analysis of Hong Kong Education Policy in 20 Years: The Intention of Making Future Citizens in Political Conflicts
Hung, Steven Chung Fun;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 713-745
380 views Abstract
2017
Social Construction of National Reality: Chinese Consciousness versus Hong Kong Consciousness
Yu, Fu-Lai Tony;Kwan, Diana S.;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 657-686
341 views Abstract
2015
eksistensi jurnal ilmiah di universitas islam negeri alauddin makassar (perannya dalam mendukung universitas islam negeri alauddin makassar menuju world-class university)
;Hildawati Almah
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 172-184
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
Are the Conflicts between the U.S. and China Manageable?
Zhou, Jinghao;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1075-1108
295 views Abstract
2017
kolaborasi penulis dalam berita biologi jurnal ilmu-ilmu hayati 2011-2016
;Rochani Nani Rahayu
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 196-206
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
kepemimpinan di perpustakaan berdasarkan emotional intellegience dalam menghadapi globalisasi informasi
;Miftahunnisa' Igiriza
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 113-120
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimalisasi peran pustakawan dalam membentuk pola pikir masyarakat melalui pendidikan informal
;Rostamaji Korniawan
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 130-139
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
pengembangan repositori institusi sebagai sarana komunikasi ilmiah di universitas islam negeri (uin) imam bonjol padang
;Arwendria Arwendria;Ariska Oktavia
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 141-150
260 views DOI Abstract
2013
penerapan knowledge management di perpustakaan (studi kasus di perpustakaan stain curup)
;Rhoni Rodin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 35-46
215 views Abstract
2019
pengembangan repositori institusi sebagai sarana komunikasi ilmiah di universitas islam negeri (uin) imam bonjol padang
;Arwendria Arwendria;Ariska Oktavia
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 141-150
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
kontruksi makna pegiat perpustakaan jalanan (studi fenomenologi tentang kontruksi makna pegiat perpustakaan jalanan di kota bandung)
;Nugraha Dwi Saputra;Ninis Agustini Damayani;Asep Saeful Rahman
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 152-159
37 views DOI Abstract
2017
kepemimpinan di perpustakaan berdasarkan emotional intellegience dalam menghadapi globalisasi informasi
;Miftahunnisa' Igiriza
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 113-120
273 views DOI Abstract
2017
kolaborasi penulis dalam berita biologi jurnal ilmu-ilmu hayati 2011-2016
;Rochani Nani Rahayu
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 196-206
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
Are the Conflicts between the U.S. and China Manageable?
Zhou, Jinghao;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1075-1108
295 views Abstract
2017
Contextual Analysis of Hong Kong Education Policy in 20 Years: The Intention of Making Future Citizens in Political Conflicts
Hung, Steven Chung Fun;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 713-745
380 views Abstract
2017
Social Construction of National Reality: Chinese Consciousness versus Hong Kong Consciousness
Yu, Fu-Lai Tony;Kwan, Diana S.;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 657-686
341 views Abstract
2016
bauran promosi jasa perpustakaan (studi evaluasi model cipp pada bauran promosi di upt perpustakaan isi surakarta tahun 2010-2014)
;Wahyu Karminah
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 91-103
136 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengelolaan arsip elektronik berbasis teknologi
;Machsun Rifauddin
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 168-178
98 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimalisasi peran pustakawan dalam membentuk pola pikir masyarakat melalui pendidikan informal
;Rostamaji Korniawan
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 130-139
263 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,754 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.