contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4895 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal
Abbreviated Name contemporary chinese political economy and strategic relations: an international journal
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
“Kazakhstani” Identity, Eurasian Regionalism and Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Biopolitics of Forced Migration, Modernity and Multilateralism
Peleo, Aliya Sartbayeva;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 247-302
365 views Abstract
2017
Contextual Analysis of Hong Kong Education Policy in 20 Years: The Intention of Making Future Citizens in Political Conflicts
Hung, Steven Chung Fun;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 713-745
330 views Abstract
2017
Social Construction of National Reality: Chinese Consciousness versus Hong Kong Consciousness
Yu, Fu-Lai Tony;Kwan, Diana S.;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 657-686
304 views Abstract
2015
eksistensi jurnal ilmiah di universitas islam negeri alauddin makassar (perannya dalam mendukung universitas islam negeri alauddin makassar menuju world-class university)
;Hildawati Almah
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 172-184
255 views DOI Abstract
2017
Are the Conflicts between the U.S. and China Manageable?
Zhou, Jinghao;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1075-1108
246 views Abstract
2017
kolaborasi penulis dalam berita biologi jurnal ilmu-ilmu hayati 2011-2016
;Rochani Nani Rahayu
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 196-206
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
kepemimpinan di perpustakaan berdasarkan emotional intellegience dalam menghadapi globalisasi informasi
;Miftahunnisa' Igiriza
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 113-120
221 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimalisasi peran pustakawan dalam membentuk pola pikir masyarakat melalui pendidikan informal
;Rostamaji Korniawan
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 130-139
212 views DOI Abstract
2019
pengembangan repositori institusi sebagai sarana komunikasi ilmiah di universitas islam negeri (uin) imam bonjol padang
;Arwendria Arwendria;Ariska Oktavia
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 141-150
210 views DOI Abstract
2013
penerapan knowledge management di perpustakaan (studi kasus di perpustakaan stain curup)
;Rhoni Rodin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 35-46
177 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.