Indexed in Journament

diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

ISSN 1442-2050· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,910 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
453 Articles
Scores higher than 62.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name dis esophagus
Abbreviated Name dis esophagus
ISSN 1442-2050

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 13.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 44.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 13.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 5.4
Content Distribution 44.2 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (453)

2019
Heartburn and dyspepsia symptom severity improves after treatment and correlates with histology in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Changes in high-resolution manometric diagnosis over time: implications for clinical decision-making.
266 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cervical lymph node metastases in thoracic esophageal cancer: a systematic review
58 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.193. Neoadjuvant Therapies vs Upfront Surgery for cT2N0 Oesophageal Cancer – a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
48 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
P1.043. Chylothorax After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes After Esophageal Resection. a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
41 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.046. Pedicled Omental Flap Preserving the Right Gastroepiploic Artery for Gastric Conduit Reconstruction in Multistage Surgery for Aortoesophageal Fistula
40 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.231. Patients With Anastomotic Stricture After McKeown Operation for Esophageal Cancer Is Associated With Lower Rate of Recurrence: Retrospective Cohort Study
39 views DOI Abstract
2026
PD06.06. The Effect of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on EndoFlip Parameters: A Retrospective Cohort Study
28 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.231. Patients With Anastomotic Stricture After McKeown Operation for Esophageal Cancer Is Associated With Lower Rate of Recurrence: Retrospective Cohort Study
39 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.150. Patterns of Microscopic Longitudinal Extension in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With or Without Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy
33 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.160. Role of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Multidisciplinary Treatment for T4b Cervical Esophageal Cancer
36 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.046. Pedicled Omental Flap Preserving the Right Gastroepiploic Artery for Gastric Conduit Reconstruction in Multistage Surgery for Aortoesophageal Fistula
40 views DOI Abstract
2026
P1.043. Chylothorax After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes After Esophageal Resection. a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
41 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,910 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

13.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.