the european journal of general practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1656 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the european journal of general practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name eur j gen pract
Abbreviated Name eur j gen pract
ISSN 1751-1402
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/igen20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2019
Primary care healthcare policy implementation in the Eastern Mediterranean region; experiences of six countries: Part II.
Nashat, Nagwa;Hadjij, Redouane;Al Dabbagh, Abdul Munem;Tarawneh, Mohammed Rasoul;Alduwaisan, Huda;Zohra, Fatima;AlFaris, Eiad Abdelmohsen;Quezada-Yamamoto, Harumi;van Weel, Chris;Rawaf, Salman;
, pp. 1-6
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of health literacy in the adult population registered to family medicine physicians in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Todorovic, Nevena;Jovic-Vranes, Aleksandra;Djikanovic, Bosiljka;Pilipovic-Broceta, Natasa;Vasiljevic, Nadja;Lucic-Samardzija, Vesna;Peric, Aleksandar;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 32-38
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
study of erythrocyte indices, erythrocyte morphometric indicators, and oxygen-binding properties of hemoglobin hematoporphyrin patients with cardiovascular diseases
;Victor V. Revin;Antonina A. Ushakova;Natalia V. Gromova;Larisa A. Balykova;Elvira S. Revina;Vera V. Stolyarova;Tatiana A. Stolbova;Ilya N. Solomadin;Alexander Yu. Tychkov;Nadezhda V. Revina;Oksana G. Imarova
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
278 views DOI Abstract
2015
association of abo blood group phenotype and allele frequency with chikungunya fever
;Pairaya Rujirojindakul;Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong;Pornprot Limprasert
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
profiling β thalassemia mutations in consanguinity and nonconsanguinity for prenatal screening and awareness programme
;Ravindra Kumar;Vandana Arya;Sarita Agarwal
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
246 views DOI Abstract
2011
long-term outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation with adequate peripheral blood stem cell mobilization using plerixafor and g-csf in poor mobilizer lymphoma and myeloma patients
;Jan S. Moreb;Donya Salmasinia;Jack Hsu;Wei Hou;Christina Cline;Emma Rosenau
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
2014
outcome of adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated by pediatrics versus adults protocols
;Abeer Ibrahim;Amany Ali;Mahmoud M. Mohammed
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
2011
the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory hodgkin's lymphoma patients
;Evgeny Klyuchnikov;Ulrike Bacher;Nicolaus Kröger;Ilya Kazantsev;Tatjana Zabelina;Francis Ayuk;Axel Rolf Zander
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
217 views DOI Abstract
2012
the zebrafish as a tool to study hematopoiesis, human blood diseases, and immune function
;Jason Berman;Elspeth Payne;Christopher Hall
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
202 views DOI
2015
determinants of overall and progression-free survival of nigerian patients with philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia
;Anthony A. Oyekunle;Rahman A. Bolarinwa;Adesola T. Oyelese;Lateef Salawu;Muheez A. Durosinmi
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
197 views DOI Abstract
View All 31 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.