Indexed in Journament

jmir research protocols

ISSN 1929-0748· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,740 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
113 Articles
Scores higher than 87.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

JMIR Research Protocols (ISSN 1929-0748) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, study and trial protocols, reports of ongoing research, current methods and approaches, and preliminary results from pilot studies or formative research. While the original focus was on the design of medical and health-related research and technology innovations, JRP publishes research protocols, proposals, feasibility studies, methods and early results in all areas of medical and health research. JMIR Res Protoc publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine (and their peer-review reports, if available), as well as early reports and formative/process evaluations of ongoing studies and descriptions of the development and pilot evaluations of innovations and software applications
Short Name jmir res protoc
Abbreviated Name jmir-rp
ISSN 1929-0748
URL https://www.researchprotocols.org
Author Instructions https://www.researchprotocols.org/about/submissions#authorGuidelines

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.3
Accessibility 45.0 18.3
Timeliness 60.0 12.6
Diversity 11.1 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 8.6 9.7
Content Distribution 60.4 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (113)

2014
Community-Based Rehabilitation Post Hospital Discharge Interventions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment Following a Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review Protocol
Katherine S McGilton;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e47-
777 views DOI Abstract
2012
Mobile.net: Mobile Telephone Text Messages to Encourage Adherence to Medication and to Follow up With People With Psychosis: Methods and Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Two-Armed Trial
Clive E Adams;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. e8-
724 views DOI Abstract
2016
Development of a Mobile Phone-Based Weight Loss Lifestyle Intervention for Filipino Americans with Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol and Early Results From the PilAm Go4Health Randomized Controlled Trial
Shoshana Arai;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e178-
704 views DOI Abstract
2018
Optimizing Gestational Weight Gain With the Eating4Two Smartphone App: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. e146-
664 views DOI Abstract
2017
Exploring Workarounds Related to Electronic Health Record System Usage: A Study Protocol
Monique Jaspers;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. e72-
651 views DOI Abstract
2016
Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities in Telehealth Trials for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Systematic Review Examining Prevalence and Language Issues
Talia Isaacs;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e43-
639 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Guidelines for Reporting Safety Outcomes in Trials of Cannabinoids for Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review
Ian Gilron;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e11637-
637 views DOI Abstract
2017
An mHealth Framework to Improve Birth Outcomes in Benue State, Nigeria: A Study Protocol
Chima Onoka;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. e100-
634 views DOI Abstract
2017
Assessment of Active Video Gaming Using Adapted Controllers by Individuals With Physical Disabilities: A Protocol
Mohanraj Thirumalai;
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. e116-
583 views DOI Abstract
2020
Specialized Nutritious Food Combined With Cash Transfers and Social and Behavior Change Communication to Prevent Stunting Among Children Aged 6 to 23 Months in Pakistan: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Sajid Bashir Soofi;
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. e19001-
571 views DOI Abstract
2025
Feasibility of Using Resting Heart Rate and Step Counts From Patient-Held Sensors During Clinical Assessment of Medical Emergencies (FUSE): Protocol for Prospective Observational Study in European Hospitals.
Barrington, Jack; Subbe, Christian; Kellett, John; Frischknecht Christensen, Erika; Brabrand, Mikkel; Nanayakkara, Prabath; Alsma, Jelmer
Vol. 14 , pp. e55975
111 views DOI Abstract
2024
Implementing and Evaluating a National Integrated Digital Registry and Clinical Decision Support System in Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (Early Psychosis Informatics Into Care): Co-Designed Protocol
Griffiths, Siân Lowri;Murray, Graham K;Logeswaran, Yanakan;Ainsworth, John;Allan, Sophie M;Campbell, Niyah;Drake, Richard J;Katshu, Mohammad Zia Ul Haq;Machin, Matthew;Pope, Megan A;Sullivan, Sarah A;Waring, Justin;Bogatsu, Tumelo;Kane, Julie;Weetman, Tyler;Johnson, Sonia;Kirkbride, James B;Upthegrove, Rachel;
Vol. 13 , pp. e50177-
56 views Abstract
2023
A Technology-Enhanced Intervention for Violence and Substance Use Prevention Among Young Black Men: Protocol for Adaptation and Pilot Testing
Emezue, Chuka;Karnik, Niranjan S;Reeder, Blaine;Schoeny, Michael;Layfield, Rickey;Zarling, Amie;Julion, Wrenetha;
Vol. 12 , pp. e43842-
52 views Abstract
2023
Mindfulness-Based App to Reduce Stress in Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Protocol for a Single-Blind Feasibility Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial.
Woodworth, Emily C;Briskin, Ellie A;Plys, Evan;Macklin, Eric;Tatar, Raquel G;Huberty, Jennifer;Vranceanu, Ana-Maria;
Vol. 12 , pp. e50108
120 views DOI Abstract
2021
Feasibility and Efficacy of Delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Through an Online Psychotherapy Tool for Depression: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Dianne Groll;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e27489-
195 views DOI Abstract
2021
Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis
Marie-Ève Lamontagne;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e29869-
78 views DOI Abstract
2021
Engaging Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in HIV Interventions Through Gay Dating Apps: Recruitment Protocol
ATN CARES Team;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e28864-
71 views DOI Abstract
2021
A Digital Gaming Intervention to Improve HIV Testing for Adolescents and Young Adults: Protocol for Development and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Daniel Greenberg;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e29792-
188 views DOI Abstract
2021
Understanding the Lived Experience of North American Dental Patients With a Single-Tooth Implant in the Upper Front Region of the Mouth: Protocol for a Qualitative Study
Stephen Ross Bryant;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e25767-
271 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effectiveness of Social Cognitive Theory–Based Interventions for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yvonne, Smith,;Rosalia, Garcia-Torres,;S, Coughlin, Steven;Jiying, Ling,;Terri, Marin,;Shaoyong, Su,;Lufei, Young,;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e17148-
148 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,740 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.