health psychology : official journal of the division of health psychology, american psychological association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#511 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

health psychology : official journal of the division of health psychology, american psychological association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name health psychol
Abbreviated Name health psychol
ISSN 1930-7810
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/hea
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of behavioral interventions in nonclinical settings for improving health outcomes.
Wilson, Dawn K;Lorig, Kate;Klein, William M P;Riley, William;Sweeney, Allison M;Christensen, Alan;
Vol. 38 , No. 8 , pp. 689-700
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations between self-monitoring and weight change in behavioral weight loss interventions.
Goldstein, Stephanie P;Goldstein, Carly M;Bond, Dale S;Raynor, Hollie A;Wing, Rena R;Thomas, J Graham;
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mechanisms of physical activity behavior change in an incentive-based intervention: Mediation analysis.
Murray, Jennifer M;French, David P;Kee, Frank;Gough, Aisling;Tang, Jianjun;Hunter, Ruth F;
354 views DOI Abstract
2010
Perceived susceptibility measures are not interchangeable: absolute, direct comparative, and indirect comparative risk.
Ranby, Krista W;Aiken, Leona S;Gerend, Mary A;Erchull, Mindy J;
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 20-8
353 views DOI Abstract
2013
Correcting injunctive norm misperceptions motivates behavior change: a randomized controlled sun protection intervention.
Reid, Allecia E;Aiken, Leona S;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 551-60
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Economic analysis in behavioral health: Toward application of standardized methodologies.
Kaplan, Robert M;Gold, Marthe;Duffy, Sarah Q;Miller, Nancy;Glassman, Jill R;Chambers, David A;Ganiats, Theodore G;Berndt, Sam;Wilson, Dawn K;
Vol. 38 , No. 8 , pp. 672-679
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
An ecological momentary episodic future thinking intervention on mother's weekly food purchases.
Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna;Seidman, Jennifer;O'Donnell, Sara;Wedderburn, Amber;Stanar, Sanja;Brande, Spencer;Epstein, Leonard H;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 159-167
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Discrimination, health, and the costs and benefits of believing in system fairness.
Dover, Tessa L;Major, Brenda;Glace, Alyssa M;
303 views DOI Abstract
2013
Intergroup relations and health disparities: a social psychological perspective.
Major, Brenda;Mendes, Wendy Berry;Dovidio, John F;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 514-24
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
Low back pain, mental health symptoms, and quality of life among injured service members.
Watrous, Jessica R;McCabe, Cameron T;Jones, Gretchen;Farrokhi, Shawn;Mazzone, Brittney;Clouser, Mary C;Galarneau, Michael R;
276 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.