Mechanisms of physical activity behavior change in an incentive-based intervention: Mediation analysis.

Clicks: 420
ID: 88590
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3 of 11 articles by views in health psychology : official journal of the division of health psychology, american psychological association

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The physical activity loyalty (PAL) scheme was a cluster randomized controlled trial of a 6-month complex intervention targeting workplace physical activity. Financial incentives were incorporated in an evidence-based behavior change program, including self-regulation techniques. This article examines short-term (< 6 months) and long-term (≥ 6 months) mediation effects on physical activity.Participants included 853 adults (457 intervention, 396 control). Physical activity was objectively assessed using pedometers at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Hypothesized short-term mediators (e.g., self-efficacy, intentions) were assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. Hypothesized long-term mediators (e.g., habit, intrinsic motivation) were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Mediation models employed the structural equation modeling product-of-coefficients approach.Intervention participants experienced significant decreases in 6-month pedometer steps/day versus controls ( = -336, = .02), which were partially mitigated by positive indirect effects through 6-month integrated regulation ( = 94.7, 95% CI [18.7, 204.4]), intrinsic motivation = 59.0, 95% CI [3.09, 154.5]), and habit ( = 198.7, 95% CI [84.3, 369.9]). There were no between-groups differences in 12-month pedometer steps/day but positive indirect effects through 6-month integrated regulation ( = 128.0, 95% CI [27.3, 313.2]), planning ( = 115.0, 95% CI [3.71, 285.5]), and habit ( = 153.3, 95% CI [39.3, 333.1]).Most examined mediators were nonsignificant, and mediation analyses did not explain decreases in physical activity for interventions versus controls. Results show that, contrary to self-determination theory hypotheses, intrinsic motivation is not necessarily adversely impacted if financial incentives are embedded in a complex intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Reference Key
murray2020mechanismshealth Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Murray, Jennifer M;French, David P;Kee, Frank;Gough, Aisling;Tang, Jianjun;Hunter, Ruth F;
Journal health psychology : official journal of the division of health psychology, american psychological association
Year 2020
DOI
10.1037/hea0000849
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.