Indexed in Journament

forum: qualitative social research

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#9,850
Journament Rank
18
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name forum: qualitative social research
Abbreviated Name forum: qualitative social research
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2008
Interpretative Visual Analysis. Developments, State of the Art and Pending Problems
Schnettler, Bernt;Raab, Jürgen;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. -
425 views Abstract
2010
Review: Annette N. Markham & Nancy K. Baym (Eds.) (2009). Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method
Biricik, Alp;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2015
Ethnography of "Local Universality": Admission Practices in an Intensive Care Unit Among Guidelines, Routines, and Humour
Lusardi, Roberto;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2010
Context, Experience, Expectation, and Action—Towards an Empirically Grounded, General Model for Analyzing Biographical Uncertainty
Reiter, Herwig;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2011
Review: Ralf Bohnsack, Aglaja Przyborski & Burkhard Schäffer (Eds.) (2010). Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren in der Forschungspraxis [The Group Discussion Technique in Research Practice]
Schmidt-Pfister, Diana;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
349 views Abstract
2009
An Interdisciplinary Approach to Complexity: Migratory Decisions of Iranians in Vienna
Czarnowski, Julia;Fliegenschnee, Katrin;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
348 views Abstract
2017
Participatory Assessment of a Matched Savings Program for Human Trafficking Survivors and their Family Members in the Philippines
Tsai, Laura Cordisco;Seballos-Llena, Ivy Flor;Datta, Rabia;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. -
340 views Abstract
2008
Review Essay: Reporting Large-Scale Qualitative Research: The Ergography
Penders, Bart;Nelis, Annemiek;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
333 views Abstract
2008
Blood and Books: Performing Code Switching
Friedman, Jeff;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
296 views Abstract
2007
Review: Zygmunt Bauman (2005). Verworfenes Leben. Die Ausgegrenzten der Moderne [Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts]
Spetsmann-Kunkel, Martin;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. -
283 views Abstract
2017
optimasi suhu dan waktu sterilisasi pada kualitas susu segar di kabupaten boyolali
;Tri Yuni Hendrawati;Suratmin Utomo
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 97-102
4 views DOI Abstract
2017
Participatory Assessment of a Matched Savings Program for Human Trafficking Survivors and their Family Members in the Philippines
Tsai, Laura Cordisco;Seballos-Llena, Ivy Flor;Datta, Rabia;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. -
340 views Abstract
2016
angka lempeng total (alt), angka paling mungkin (apm) dan total kapang khamir sebagai metode analisis sederhana untuk menentukan standar mikrobiologi pangan olahan posdaya
;Yoni Atma
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 77-83
7 views DOI Abstract
2016
usulan waktu penggantian optimum komponen mesin gas engine (prechamber gas valve) dengan model age-based replacement di pt. xyz
;Kusnadi Kusnadi;Taryana Taryana
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 45-52
212 views DOI Abstract
2015
penerapan metode algoritma bellman – ford dalam aplikasi pencarian lokasi perseroan terbatas di pt. jakarta industrial estate pulogadung (pt. jiep)
;Fenny Anggraini;Sugeng Mingparwoto
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 28-34
47 views DOI Abstract
2015
Ethnography of "Local Universality": Admission Practices in an Intensive Care Unit Among Guidelines, Routines, and Humour
Lusardi, Roberto;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2014
penggunaan metoda interferometri optik untuk menentukan perubahan laju aliran fluida gas
;Muchiar Muchiar;Kisman M. Mahmud
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 79-85
8 views DOI Abstract
2011
Review: Ralf Bohnsack, Aglaja Przyborski & Burkhard Schäffer (Eds.) (2010). Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren in der Forschungspraxis [The Group Discussion Technique in Research Practice]
Schmidt-Pfister, Diana;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
349 views Abstract
2010
Review: Annette N. Markham & Nancy K. Baym (Eds.) (2009). Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method
Biricik, Alp;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2010
Context, Experience, Expectation, and Action—Towards an Empirically Grounded, General Model for Analyzing Biographical Uncertainty
Reiter, Herwig;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.