Review Essay: Reporting Large-Scale Qualitative Research: The Ergography

Clicks: 376
ID: 71528
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 18 articles by views in forum: qualitative social research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
As social science research programmes tend to increase in scale, reporting their results in a coherent manner is growing more difficult. Andrew WEBSTER's edited volume presents a wealth of social science research and is a pleasant read for many reasons. However, its sheer vastness can hardly be contained in an edited volume. In this article, we review the book itself whilst we also discuss what it means to report about large scale social science research programmes and propose an alternative mode for this reporting: the ergography. The ergography provides a window not so much on the results of the programme but rather on the work that is being done in the context of a research programme. The ergography allows for an active stand from the reader and aims to bring the reader as closely as possible to the laboratory, doctor's office or hospital that has been part of the research. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901182
Reference Key
penders2008reviewforum Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Penders, Bart;Nelis, Annemiek;
Journal forum: qualitative social research
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1005
Keywords
Technology Science social sciences (general) architecture building construction environmental engineering earthwork. foundations

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.