Review Essay: Reporting Large-Scale Qualitative Research: The Ergography
Clicks: 280
ID: 71528
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
81.1
/100
278 views
225 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
As social science research programmes tend to increase in scale, reporting their results in a coherent manner is growing more difficult. Andrew WEBSTER's edited volume presents a wealth of social science research and is a pleasant read for many reasons. However, its sheer vastness can hardly be contained in an edited volume. In this article, we review the book itself whilst we also discuss what it means to report about large scale social science research programmes and propose an alternative mode for this reporting: the ergography. The ergography provides a window not so much on the results of the programme but rather on the work that is being done in the context of a research programme. The ergography allows for an active stand from the reader and aims to bring the reader as closely as possible to the laboratory, doctor's office or hospital that has been part of the research.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901182
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (155 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
penders2008reviewforum
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Penders, Bart;Nelis, Annemiek; |
| Journal | forum: qualitative social research |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.