visual communication quarterly | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1108 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

visual communication quarterly

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name visual communication quarterly
Abbreviated Name visual communication quarterly
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2017
principled disagreements: adhesion to intergroup justice standards in the context of the belgian linguistic conflict
;Olivier Klein;Pierre Bouchat;Assaad Azzi;Olivier Luminet
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 13-31
269 views DOI Abstract
2013
investigating the relationship between flourishing and self-compassion: a structural equation modeling approach
;Seydi Ahmet Satici;Recep Uysal;Ahmet Akin
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. 85-99
256 views DOI Abstract
2016
servant leadership, organisational citizenship behavior and creativity: the mediating role of team-member exchange
;Winifrida Malingumu;Jeroen Stouten;Martin Euwema;Emmanuel Babyegeya
Vol. 56 , No. 4 , pp. 1-15
250 views DOI Abstract
2015
direct and indirect effects of young adults’ relationship status on life satisfaction through loneliness and perceived social support
;Katarzyna Adamczyk;Chris Segrin
Vol. 55 , No. 4 , pp. 196-211
248 views DOI Abstract
2016
Time, Ethics, and the Films of Christopher Nolan
Brislin, T.
Vol. 23 , pp. 199-209
246 views DOI
2010
anxious and depressive avoidance and symptoms of prolonged grief, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder
;Paul A Boelen;Jan van den Bout
Vol. 50 , No. 1-2 , pp. 49-67
233 views DOI Abstract
2017
a french translation of the pleasure arousal dominance (pad) semantic differential scale for the measure of affect and drive
;Sandrine Detandt;Christophe Leys;Ariane Bazan
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 17-31
231 views DOI Abstract
2006
need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: the impact of urgency and permanence tendencies
;Arne Roets;Alain Van Hiel
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 235-252
220 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mocking the “Messiah”: Editorial Cartoons and Critiques of Journalists' “Obamamania”
Henson, L.
Vol. 26 , pp. 161-173
214 views DOI
2016
validation of the marijuana effect expectancies questionnaire (meeq) in a non-clinical french-speaking adolescent sample
;Emilie Schmits;Etienne Quertemont;Eric Guillem;Cécile Mathys
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 23-41
213 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.