journal of popular culture | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2233 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of popular culture

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim ahci soc
Short Name journal of popular culture
Abbreviated Name journal of popular culture
ISSN 0022-3840
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15405931
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2017
Suiting up the Hero: Legacies of Medieval and Renaissance Armor and Identity in Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins
Gearhart, G.
Vol. 50 , pp. 665-684
300 views DOI
2013
effects of sperm competition on genetic variation of rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) progeny using microsattelite markers
;Hossein Moradyan;Saeed Keyvanshokooh;Mustafa Muhaghegh Dolatabady;Einollah Gorjipour
Vol. 5 , No. 14 , pp. 17-34
282 views Abstract
2014
seed morphology diversity in the certain silene species (caryophyllaceae) from iran and its taxonomical significance
;Abbas Gholipour;Fahimeh Kuhdar
Vol. 6 , No. 18 , pp. 107-118
256 views Abstract
2016
assessment of genetic variation in different stachys lavandulifolia accessions using morphological and essential oil content
;Fatemeh Arabsalehi;Mehdi Rahimmalek;Mohammad Hosein Ehtemam;Abbas Salehi
Vol. 8 , No. 26 , pp. 41-50
253 views Abstract
2013
plant diversity of five important wetlands of babol mazandaran province, iran
;Farrokh Ghahremaninejad;Alireza Naqinezhad;Vahid Amirgholipour Kasmani
Vol. 4 , No. 13 , pp. 13-24
251 views Abstract
2011
foliar anatomy and micromorphology of festuca l. and its taxonomic applications
;Fatemeh Zarinkamar;Nasrin Eslami Jouyandeh
Vol. 3 , No. 8 , pp. 55-63
236 views Abstract
2010
using protein markers of embryo and seed storage proteins in identification of four pistachio cultivars
;Ali Akbar Ehsanpour;Behrokh Shojaie;Fatemeh Rostami
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 1-10
230 views Abstract
2011
genetic diversity of the two populations of common carp (cyprinus carpio) in gharahsu and anzali regions using eight microsatellite markers
;Melika Ghelichpour;Ali Shabani;Bahareh Shabanpour
Vol. 2 , No. 5 , pp. 41-48
226 views Abstract
2015
wing shape variation among central asian populations of calopteryx splendens
;Saber Sadeghi;Yaser Bakhshi;Henri Dumont
Vol. 7 , No. 23 , pp. 13-26
222 views Abstract
2014
population structure of the caspian shad (alosa braschnikowi borodin, 1904) in the southern coast of the caspian sea between gomishan and miankaleh regions
;Omid Jafari;Ali Shabani;Hamed Kolangi Miandare
Vol. 6 , No. 19 , pp. 15-26
219 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.