envisioning legality: law, culture and representation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#287 / 33,930
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

envisioning legality: law, culture and representation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name envisioning legality: law, culture and representation
Abbreviated Name envisioning legality: law, culture and representation
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2015
culture and age influences upon gambling and problem gambling
;Mythily Subramaniam;Edimansyah Abdin;Shazana Shahwan;Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar;Louisa Picco;Colette Joy Browning;Shane Andrew Thomas;Siow Ann Chong
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. 57-63
319 views DOI Abstract
2015
desire thinking as a mediator of the relationship between novelty seeking and craving
;Gabriele Caselli;Chiara Manfredi;Annalisa Ferraris;Francesca Vinciullo;Marcantonio M. Spada
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. 2-6
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
improving cerebral oxygenation, cognition and autonomic nervous system control of a chronic alcohol abuser through a three-month running program
;Daniel Aranha Cabral;Kell Grandjean da Costa;Alexandre Hideki Okano;Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy;Vanessa Paula Rachetti;Eduardo Bodnariuc Fontes
Vol. 6 , pp. 83-89
278 views Abstract
2017
'Seeing' justice done: Envisioning legality in Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Trilogy
Peters, T.
, pp. 68-95
277 views DOI
2016
exploring the alcohol-behaviour link: myopic self-enhancement in the absence of alcohol consumption as a function of past alcohol use
;Antony C. Moss;Ian P. Albery;Khaleda Rahman
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 37-43
276 views DOI Abstract
2016
the importance of social identities in the management of and recovery from ‘diabulimia’: a qualitative exploration
;Amy Hastings;Niamh McNamara;Jacqueline Allan;Mike Marriott
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 78-86
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
do addicts have free will? an empirical approach to a vexing question
;Gene M. Heyman
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 85-93
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
hangover resistance in a canadian university student population
;L. Darren Kruisselbrink;Adriana C. Bervoets;Suzanne de Klerk;Aurora J.A.E. van de Loo;Joris C. Verster
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 14-18
266 views DOI Abstract
2018
the prevalence and associated factors of new psychoactive substance use: a 2016 thailand national household survey
;Rungsiya Wonguppa;Manop Kanato
Vol. 7 , pp. 111-115
218 views Abstract
2015
testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers
;Ian P. Albery;Dinkar Sharma;Simon Noyce;Daniel Frings;Antony C. Moss
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. 68-72
208 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.