Indexed in Journament

restorative neurology and neuroscience

ISSN 1878-3627· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,479 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 13% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

简称 restor neurol neurosci
缩写名称 restor neurol neurosci
ISSN 1878-3627
URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09226028

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 57.0 25.7
Community Impact 1.4 5.8
Content Distribution 67.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
426 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
368 views DOI Abstract
2015
grounded theory and action research as pillars for interpretive information systems research: a comparative study
;Manal A. Abdel-Fattah
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 309-327
338 views DOI Abstract
2011
evaluation comparison of some ad hoc networks routing protocols
;A.A.A. Radwan;T.M. Mahmoud;E.H. Houssein
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 95-106
308 views DOI Abstract
2014
intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based topsis method for multi-criteria decision making
;Deepa Joshi;Sanjay Kumar
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 97-104
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
parametric comparison of emds algorithm with some symmetric cryptosystems
;Mani Arora;Sandeep Sharma;Derick Engles
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
295 views DOI Abstract
2013
srfid: a hash-based security scheme for low cost rfid systems
;Walid I. Khedr
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-98
284 views DOI Abstract
2016
classification of clustered microcalcifications using mlffbp-ann and
;Baljit Singh Khehra;Amar Partap Singh Pharwaha
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 11-20
283 views DOI Abstract
2012
alternate mutation based artificial immune algorithm for step fixed charge transportation problem
;Mahmoud Moustafa El-Sherbiny
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 123-134
266 views DOI Abstract
2012
a comparative performance evaluation of intrusion detection techniques for hierarchical wireless sensor networks
;H.H. Soliman;Noha A. Hikal;Nehal A. Sakr
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 225-238
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
parametric comparison of emds algorithm with some symmetric cryptosystems
;Mani Arora;Sandeep Sharma;Derick Engles
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
295 views DOI Abstract
2016
classification of clustered microcalcifications using mlffbp-ann and
;Baljit Singh Khehra;Amar Partap Singh Pharwaha
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 11-20
283 views DOI Abstract
2015
fuzzy 2-partition entropy threshold selection based on big bang–big crunch optimization algorithm
;Baljit Singh Khehra;Amar Partap Singh Pharwaha;Manisha Kaushal
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 133-150
185 views DOI Abstract
2015
context
;Sugam Sharma;Udoyara Sunday Tim;Marinelle Payton;Hari Cohly;Shashi Gadia;Johnny Wong;Sudharshanam Karakala
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 243-251
127 views DOI Abstract
2015
grounded theory and action research as pillars for interpretive information systems research: a comparative study
;Manal A. Abdel-Fattah
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 309-327
338 views DOI Abstract
2015
rec
;F.O. Isinkaye;Y.O. Folajimi;B.A. Ojokoh
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 261-273
176 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
368 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
426 views DOI Abstract
2014
a novel neuro-fuzzy classification technique for data mining
;Soumadip Ghosh;Sushanta Biswas;Debasree Sarkar;Partha Pratim Sarkar
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 129-147
141 views DOI Abstract
2014
intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based topsis method for multi-criteria decision making
;Deepa Joshi;Sanjay Kumar
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 97-104
297 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,479 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

26.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.