evaluation comparison of some ad hoc networks routing protocols

Clicks: 311
ID: 134918
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #4 of 21 articles by views in restorative neurology and neuroscience

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are characterized by multi-hop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols plays an important role. A variety of routing protocols targeted specifically at this environment have been developed and some performance simulations are made on numbers of routing protocols like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Location-Aided Routing (LAR). To the best of our knowledge, no published work is available in the literature, which compares as many criteria as we have done to evaluate the performance of the considered routing protocols. In this paper we perform extensive simulations using GloMoSim simulator considering 18 performance metrics. To determine the impact of network size on the performance of these protocols we considered two different scenarios, namely, 100 and 200 nodes, with rectangular area sizes 1500 × 1000 and 2000 × 1500 m2, respectively.
Reference Key
radwan2011egyptianevaluation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;A.A.A. Radwan;T.M. Mahmoud;E.H. Houssein
Journal restorative neurology and neuroscience
Year 2011
DOI
10.1016/j.eij.2011.04.001
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.