hss journal : the musculoskeletal journal of hospital for special surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1510 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

hss journal : the musculoskeletal journal of hospital for special surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name hss j
Abbreviated Name hss j
ISSN 1556-3316
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/home/hssa
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2019
Surgical Techniques, Outcomes, Indications, and Complications of Simultaneous High Tibial Osteotomy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Gupta, Arnav;Tejpal, Tushar;Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar;Horner, Nolan S;Simunovic, Nicole;Duong, Andrew;Ayeni, Olufemi R;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 176-184
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantifying the Impact of Patient-Specific Factors and Disease Severity on Clinical Decision Making in Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Case-Based Survey.
Schumaier, Adam P;Bedeir, Yehia H;Dines, Joshua S;Kenter, Keith;Gulotta, Lawrence V;Dines, David M;Grawe, Brian M;
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 276-285
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Intramedullary Nails Perform Poorly in Long-Bone Surgery.
Fragomen, Austin T;Teplensky, Jason;Robert Rozbruch, S;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 109-114
262 views DOI Abstract
2017
entrepreneurial university perspective: tracking labor force capacity to support industrialization processes in the emerging markets, evidence from kazakhstan data
;Dilara Orynbassarova
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 5-11
256 views DOI Abstract
2015
mutual fund performance: evidence from south africa
;Ömer Faruk Tan
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 49-57
250 views DOI Abstract
2018
Firefighters Have a Higher Incidence of Trochlear Chondral Lesions than the Normal Population.
Brady, Jacqueline M;Brown, Haydée C;Nguyen, Joseph T;Smith, Halley;Mannor, Dana A;Kelly, Anne M;Hannafin, Jo A;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 153-158
242 views DOI Abstract
2014
firm, country and macroeconomic determinants of capital structure: evidence from turkish banking sector
;Nuri Baltacı;Hasan Ayaydın
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 47-58
209 views DOI Abstract
2014
fashion as a marketing tool and its communication aspect in developing markets
;Fatma Engin Alpat;Yusuf Ziya Aksu
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 67-76
196 views DOI Abstract
2014
investigation of effects of accreditation, institutionalization and data communication on quality improvement and employee performance
;Didem Rodoplu Şahin;Tuna Uslu
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 32-46
187 views DOI Abstract
2015
global online entrepreneurship and the impact of innovation on brands
;Ipek Krom
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 90-101
186 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.