Indexed in Journament

Systematic reviews

ISSN 2046-4053· EN

Journal Website
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.1/100
Journament Score
#5,053
Journament Rank
55
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Syst Rev
Abbreviated Name syst rev
ISSN 2046-4053
URL http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj

Publications Per Year

Articles (55)

2017
Documenting research with transgender and gender diverse people: protocol for an evidence map and thematic analysis
Marshall, Zack;Welch, Vivian;Thomas, James;Brunger, Fern;Swab, Michelle;Shemilt, Ian;Kaposy, Chris;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
727 views Abstract
2018
Use of indices to measure socio-economic status (SES) in South-Asian urban health studies: a scoping review
Saif-Ur-Rahman, K. M.;Anwar, Iqbal;Hasan, Md.;Hossain, Shahed;Shafique, Sohana;Haseen, Fariha;Khalequzzaman, Md.;Rahman, Aminur;Islam, Shariful;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
688 views Abstract
2018
The prevalence of Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer: a systematic review protocol
Ryan, Neil A. J.;Blake, Dominic;Cabrera-Dandy, Marcus;Glaire, Mark A.;Evans, D. Gareth;Crosbie, Emma J.;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
599 views Abstract
2019
Prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.
Cooray, Shamil D;Boyle, Jacqueline A;Soldatos, Georgia;Wijeyaratne, Lihini A;Teede, Helena J;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 270
582 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiential learning for primary healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol
Chamane, Nkosinothando;Kuupiel, Desmond;Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani Phosa;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
421 views Abstract
2018
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.
Clarke, Mike;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 176
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
A scoping review of mental health prevention and intervention initiatives for infants and preschoolers at risk for socio-emotional difficulties.
McLuckie, Alan;Landers, Ashley L;Curran, Janet A;Cann, Robin;Carrese, Domenica H;Nolan, Alicia;Corrigan, Kim;Carrey, Normand J;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 183
416 views DOI Abstract
2020
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, Yuxi;Liu, Xiaobo;Guo, Liuxue;Li, Juan;Zhong, Dongling;Zhang, Yonggang;Clarke, Mike;Jin, Rongjiang;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
411 views Abstract
2018
The sustainability of Lean in pediatric healthcare: a realist review.
Flynn, Rachel;Newton, Amanda S;Rotter, Thomas;Hartfield, Dawn;Walton, Sarah;Fiander, Michelle;Scott, Shannon D;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 137
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review
Minerva Kyei-Nimakoh; Mary Carolan; Terence V. McCann
393 views DOI
2023
The impact of sports participation on mental health and social outcomes in adults: a systematic review and the ‘Mental Health through Sport’ conceptual model
Narelle Eather; Levi Wade; Aurélie Pankowiak; Rochelle Eime
278 views DOI
2022
Correction: Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki;Tsokani, Sofia;Zevgiti, Stella;Pagkalidou, Irene;Kontouli, Katerina-Maria;Ambarcioglu, Pinar;Pandis, Nikos;Lunny, Carole;Nikolakopoulou, Adriani;Papakonstantinou, Theodoros;Chaimani, Anna;Straus, Sharon E;Hutton, Brian;Tricco, Andrea C;Mavridis, Dimitris;Salanti, Georgia;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 112
134 views DOI
2021
Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update
Beck, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
2 views DOI
2020
Adverse childhood experience and adult persistent pain and disability: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bussières, André;Hartvigsen, Jan;Ferreira, Manuela L;Ferreira, Paulo H;Hancock, Mark J;Stone, Laura S;Wideman, Timothy H;Boruff, Jill;Elklit, Ask;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 215
250 views DOI Abstract
2020
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections.
Mortazhejri, Sameh;Hong, Patrick Jiho;Yu, Ashley M;Hong, Brian Younho;Stacey, Dawn;Bhatia, R Sacha;Grimshaw, Jeremy M;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 106
199 views DOI Abstract
2020
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, Yuxi;Liu, Xiaobo;Guo, Liuxue;Li, Juan;Zhong, Dongling;Zhang, Yonggang;Clarke, Mike;Jin, Rongjiang;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
411 views Abstract
2020
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.
Jørgensen, Lars;Gøtzsche, Peter C;Jefferson, Tom;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 42
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol.
Madlabana, Cynthia Zandile;Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani Phosa;Petersen, Inge;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 40
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality.
Brown, Jennifer V E;Crampton, Paul E S;Finn, Gabrielle M;Morgan, Jessica E;, ;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 26
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Situation analysis of onchocerciasis in Cameroon: a protocol for systematic review of epidemiological studies and impact of disease control interventions.
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C;Domche, André;Niamsi-Emalio, Yannick;Moungui, Henri C;Walker, Martin;Basáñez, Maria-Gloria;Kamgno, Joseph;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 27
389 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.