Indexed in Journament

Systematic reviews

ISSN 2046-4053· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,103 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
55 Articles
Scores higher than 79.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Syst Rev
Abbreviated Name syst rev
ISSN 2046-4053
URL http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 38.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 64.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (55)

2017
Documenting research with transgender and gender diverse people: protocol for an evidence map and thematic analysis
Marshall, Zack;Welch, Vivian;Thomas, James;Brunger, Fern;Swab, Michelle;Shemilt, Ian;Kaposy, Chris;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
786 views Abstract
2018
Use of indices to measure socio-economic status (SES) in South-Asian urban health studies: a scoping review
Saif-Ur-Rahman, K. M.;Anwar, Iqbal;Hasan, Md.;Hossain, Shahed;Shafique, Sohana;Haseen, Fariha;Khalequzzaman, Md.;Rahman, Aminur;Islam, Shariful;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
706 views Abstract
2018
The prevalence of Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer: a systematic review protocol
Ryan, Neil A. J.;Blake, Dominic;Cabrera-Dandy, Marcus;Glaire, Mark A.;Evans, D. Gareth;Crosbie, Emma J.;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
619 views Abstract
2019
Prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.
Cooray, Shamil D;Boyle, Jacqueline A;Soldatos, Georgia;Wijeyaratne, Lihini A;Teede, Helena J;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 270
612 views DOI Abstract
2018
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.
Clarke, Mike;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 176
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiential learning for primary healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol
Chamane, Nkosinothando;Kuupiel, Desmond;Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani Phosa;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
463 views Abstract
2018
The sustainability of Lean in pediatric healthcare: a realist review.
Flynn, Rachel;Newton, Amanda S;Rotter, Thomas;Hartfield, Dawn;Walton, Sarah;Fiander, Michelle;Scott, Shannon D;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 137
437 views DOI Abstract
2020
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, Yuxi;Liu, Xiaobo;Guo, Liuxue;Li, Juan;Zhong, Dongling;Zhang, Yonggang;Clarke, Mike;Jin, Rongjiang;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
432 views Abstract
2019
A scoping review of mental health prevention and intervention initiatives for infants and preschoolers at risk for socio-emotional difficulties.
McLuckie, Alan;Landers, Ashley L;Curran, Janet A;Cann, Robin;Carrese, Domenica H;Nolan, Alicia;Corrigan, Kim;Carrey, Normand J;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 183
431 views DOI Abstract
2020
Situation analysis of onchocerciasis in Cameroon: a protocol for systematic review of epidemiological studies and impact of disease control interventions.
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C;Domche, André;Niamsi-Emalio, Yannick;Moungui, Henri C;Walker, Martin;Basáñez, Maria-Gloria;Kamgno, Joseph;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 27
424 views DOI Abstract
2023
The impact of sports participation on mental health and social outcomes in adults: a systematic review and the ‘Mental Health through Sport’ conceptual model
Narelle Eather; Levi Wade; Aurélie Pankowiak; Rochelle Eime
295 views DOI
2022
Correction: Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki;Tsokani, Sofia;Zevgiti, Stella;Pagkalidou, Irene;Kontouli, Katerina-Maria;Ambarcioglu, Pinar;Pandis, Nikos;Lunny, Carole;Nikolakopoulou, Adriani;Papakonstantinou, Theodoros;Chaimani, Anna;Straus, Sharon E;Hutton, Brian;Tricco, Andrea C;Mavridis, Dimitris;Salanti, Georgia;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 112
164 views DOI
2021
Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update
Beck, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
28 views DOI
2020
Adverse childhood experience and adult persistent pain and disability: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bussières, André;Hartvigsen, Jan;Ferreira, Manuela L;Ferreira, Paulo H;Hancock, Mark J;Stone, Laura S;Wideman, Timothy H;Boruff, Jill;Elklit, Ask;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 215
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections.
Mortazhejri, Sameh;Hong, Patrick Jiho;Yu, Ashley M;Hong, Brian Younho;Stacey, Dawn;Bhatia, R Sacha;Grimshaw, Jeremy M;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 106
226 views DOI Abstract
2020
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, Yuxi;Liu, Xiaobo;Guo, Liuxue;Li, Juan;Zhong, Dongling;Zhang, Yonggang;Clarke, Mike;Jin, Rongjiang;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
432 views Abstract
2020
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.
Jørgensen, Lars;Gøtzsche, Peter C;Jefferson, Tom;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 42
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol.
Madlabana, Cynthia Zandile;Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani Phosa;Petersen, Inge;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 40
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality.
Brown, Jennifer V E;Crampton, Paul E S;Finn, Gabrielle M;Morgan, Jessica E;, ;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 26
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Situation analysis of onchocerciasis in Cameroon: a protocol for systematic review of epidemiological studies and impact of disease control interventions.
Nana-Djeunga, Hugues C;Domche, André;Niamsi-Emalio, Yannick;Moungui, Henri C;Walker, Martin;Basáñez, Maria-Gloria;Kamgno, Joseph;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 27
424 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,103 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.